Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- How good is the COMAC C919? March 20, 2025
- Boeing CFO Brian West: OK on tariffs for now, backlogs and inventories help March 20, 2025
- Pontifications: Southwest’s core problems are not solved by business model changes-yet March 19, 2025
- Boeing 2024 Proxy Statement: Executive Compensation includes retirement gifts for Calhoun, Deal; housing support for Ortberg, Pope, and other stuff March 17, 2025
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 13. March 14, 2025
Boeing’s shareholders: which do you prefer? Dilution or bankruptcy?
By Scott Hamilton
Sept. 23, 2024, © Leeham News: A Wells Fargo analyst calculated The Boeing Co. might have to issue 190 million shares of stock to get itself out of the financial mess it’s in.
At the $155 range Boeing’s stock has been recently trading, which would be just shy of $30bn.
Last week, Barron’s (a financial publication) wrote that Boeing has too much debt and perhaps a $10bn equity offering would suffice.
The Wells Fargo analyst and Barron’s complained that issuing stock would hurt shareholders due to the dilution.
On Sept. 12, the day Boeing’s IAM 751 union rejected the Tentative Agreement for a new labor contract and voted to strike at midnight, LNA did a deep dive analysis of the Wells Fargo equity speculation and the increasing speculation that Boeing might be forced into bankruptcy if the strike lasts a long time.
Before that, LNA analyzed the net debt levels, how long it would take to pay it down, and the annual interest to be paid.
Boeing’s financial position is precarious. It needs $10bn in cash to run the company; on June 30, the end of the second quarter, it had $12bn in cash. It’s losing an estimated $100m a day during the strike.
Wall Street types wring their hands over the dilution of a possible stock offering. This begs the question: would they prefer dilution or bankruptcy, which typically wipes out shareholders?
Or would they prefer at least a decade of stagnation while Boeing tries to operationally repair its balance sheet?
LNA welcomes the idea of a $30bn equity offering.
Boeing won’t fully recover without drastic action. And a massive equity offering best fits this need.
Related Stories
- Boeing has too much debt. (Barron’s)
- IAM rejects contract, strikes at midnight
- Boeing’s liabilities problem: a decade to resolve
- Melius analyst report: The Strike is a Symptom of a Bigger Problem
The A330neo for medium haul or twice the frequency with A321XLR? Part 3
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 19, 2024, © Leeham News: We examine the high-volume short-to-medium-range market and check whether a route previously reserved for the Airbus A330 can be flown with a fleet of A321XLRs. At equal per-passenger operational costs, doubling the frequency is advantageous and can drive market growth, revenue, and margin.
After comparing passenger only operating costs, such as per seat mile Cash Operating Costs (COC), we add cargo to the mix. To compare efficiency, we then need to do a route margin comparison.
Summary:
- When we add cargo to the revenue mix, the A321XLR’s limited cargo capability makes it a less attractive alternative for routes with cargo traffic.
- The A321XLR is still an interesting alternative for routes with few cargo opportunities and where route frequency can motivate higher passenger yields.
Why the IAM 751 rejected the Boeing contract and what is needed for approval
Subscription Required
By the Leeham News Team
Analysis
Sept. 16, 2024, © Leeham News — The lopsided outcome of last week’s vote by the International Association of Machinists District 751 union members to resoundingly reject Boeing’s four-year contract offer caught a lot of observers by surprise, including us.
Not that we didn’t expect the offer would be rejected. That seemed a reasonable bet. But if anyone tells you their Magic 8 ball had predicted a 94.6% vote to reject the contract and a 96% vote to strike, they’re overstating.
Our industry sources tell us that Boeing management was utterly gobsmacked by the result. Even the union staffers and officers we talked to on the night of the vote were surprised.
The result is now that some 33,000 751 members spent the weekend on picket lines surrounding Boeing facilities in Washington state, Oregon, and Edwards Air Force Base in California.
And Boeing management, which had very little leverage going into these contract talks, has approximately zero leverage now.
The problem, for everyone in our industry hoping for a quick resolution of this strike, is that Boeing has been acting since intensive talks started in August like it doesn’t understand how little leverage it has over the union this year. Despite new CEO Kelly Ortberg’s factory floor visits and talk about a “reset” with the unions at Boeing, Boeing acted like it believes it’s still 2014 when it won a bitter fight for a contract amendment granting concessions in exchange for locating the 777X final assembly line in Everett (WA).
Maybe Thursday night’s results will be the moment Boeing’s labor relations strategy needs if it’s ever going to solve its interconnected safety, quality, reputational, and cash-flow problems.
Summary
- What’s the latest
- Why the offer failed
- At the table
- Where we are
- How does this end?
IAM rejects Boeing contract, strikes at midnight
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
Sept. 12, 2024, © Leeham News: Boeing’s largest union today rejected a four-year contract and approved a walk-out beginning at midnight tonight.
The vote to reject the contract and go on strike were overwhelming: 94.6% to reject the contract, 96% for the strike.
For financially ailing Boeing, a strike is the last thing it needs. When the union, IAM 751, last struck in 2008, the walk-out lasted 57 days and set the foundation for labor wars that continued to this day. Then-CEO Jim McNerney the following year located the second 787 assembly line in South Carolina. (The first line, in Everett, was closed during the COVID pandemic.) In 2011, McNerney threatened to build the 737 MAX elsewhere if 751 members didn’t approve a contract amendment with concessions. He repeated the process in 2013 and 2014 with the 777X development. The latter was the second amendment to the 2008 labor contract that governed wages and benefits for the huge union, which represents workers at Boeing’s factories in Renton and Everett, home to the 737 and 767/KC-46A and 777, respectively. The IAM 751 also represents workers at other Boeing locations.
Union leadership want to recover benefit concessions and sharply increase wages that failed to keep up with inflation. They wanted a guarantee that the next Boeing airplane will be assembled in Puget Sound (the greater Seattle area). They wanted a seat on the Board of Directors and a role in changing Boeing’s failed safety culture.
Management wanted to hold the line. The company remains in a loss-making position, led by the continuing turmoil at Boeing Commercial Airplanes. The defense unit, which is not represented by 751, also is bleeding profits. The two units caused Boeing to burn through nearly $10bn in cash in the first half of this year alone. Only the services unit is making money, but not nearly enough to offset the losses and negative cash flows at the other two units.
More losses and negative cash flow is expected for the quarter ending this month. Company CFO Brian West speaks at a Morgan Stanley investors conference tomorrow. His will be the first detailed response to the union vote, whatever the outcome.
Internally, Boeing prepared for a 2-12 week strike.
Some observers fear that a long strike could shove Boeing into bankruptcy. LNA doesn’t agree, but we’ve nevertheless analyzed the prospect.
The A330neo for medium haul or twice the frequency with A321XLR? Part 2
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 12, 2024, © Leeham News: We examine the high-volume short-to-medium-range market and check whether a route previously reserved for the Airbus A330neo can be flown with a fleet of A321XLRs. At equal per-passenger operational costs, doubling the frequency is advantageous and can drive market growth, revenue, and margin.
After comparing the aircraft and their seating, we now use our Airliner Performance and Cost Model (APCM) to fly them on a Southeast Asia route and compare the operating costs.
Summary:
- The A321XLR is competitive on fuel costs but loses out on Cash costs as several cost factors don’t scale linearly with passenger capacity.
- The cost disadvantage doesn’t render the A321XLR a non-replacement for an A330-900; it just needs a positive revenue uptick from the frequency increase to be an interesting alternative.
Slow production ramp up, international sanctions slow C919 progress
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
Sept. 9, 2024, © Leeham News: China isn’t getting into the commercial aviation industry to let Airbus and Boeing supply three quarters of the market, says a consultant. The long-term outlook for the Big Two aircraft producers may be considerably more bearish than many think.
He made the following comments when asked about the new Boeing (BA) projections for the aircraft market in China, “COMAC wants to hit 150 (deliveries) in the next five years. That means that one-fourth of that China demand goes to COMAC,” said Brian Langenberg, principal and industrial strategist of Langenberg and Co. “If you believe that China got into the commercial aviation industry to let Boeing and Airbus make three-fourths of their narrow bodies aircraft,” he says people underestimate the determination of the Chinese government.
COMAC C919. Source: Leeham News.
The C919 is COMAC’s latest narrow-body jet, which began commercial service at China Eastern Airlines (CEA) in 2023. Since then, eight more have been delivered to CEA, Air China, and China Southern as COMAC slowly ramps up production. COMAC has more than 1,000 orders for the type, with the vast majority coming from airlines and lessors in China, although AerCap of Ireland has orders for 20.
COMAC’s production goals are aggressive. LNA believes the learning curve will take longer than production managers suggest. International certification by European and US regulators is also important to China and mandatory for export sales.
Related Article
China still needs Boeing to fill demand
If a strike occurs, here’s what Boeing can do
Subscription Required
- Contingency plan for 4-12 week strike.
By the Leeham News Team
Analysis
Sept. 5, 2024, © Leeham News: There seems to be quite an expectation that there will be a strike by Boeing’s touch labor union, the IAM walkout at Boeing this contract cycle. The costs associated with a strike are well understood. Crippled cash flow, upset customers, and stock price losses not counting the damage to the companies in Puget Sound that built much of their business models on Boeing worker’s paychecks. It’s never a good thing to sustain a strike of any duration because the disruptive effects can last for years.
The last time the IAM struck was in 2008, for 57 days. The strike cost Boeing billions of dollars in lost revenue, much of which was made up in the following years. The ill-will generated by the strike affected customers. Management-labor relations remain strained to this day. Union leadership is determined to recover previous givebacks in wages and benefits. They want a seat on the Board of Directors, a role in improving Boeing’s safety culture, and a guarantee that the next airplane will be assembled in Puget Sound.
Talks remain far apart, according to the union. Boeing says progress is being made. A strike seems likely at this stage.
Boeing is clear about a strike potential. In a message last week to employees, Boeing said:
Does Boeing want a strike so it can stabilize production or allow time for the supply chain to recover?
Absolutely not. Any work stoppage, whether days, weeks or months, would disrupt our production system, supply chain and most importantly, our customers. When Boeing cannot deliver airplanes as scheduled, customers question our reliability. A strike would only help the competition and hurt our suppliers.
What is Boeing supposed to do if the IAM walks out? The usual answer is sweeping and cleaning and trying to deliver whatever you can sneak out the door to keep the money coming in. It is never a very effective way to operate.
Here are some points to ponder if the strike occurs and Boeing production shuts down.
China banks on C919, but numbers say it still needs Boeing
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Sept. 2, 2024, © Leeham News: Airbus and Boeing see China doubling its airliner fleet over the next 20 years. The numbers vary between the two companies. But the underlying data points to how challenging it will be for China to meet this demand without letting Boeing back into the mix.
Boeing has largely been frozen out of China since 2017 when then-President Donald Trump initiated a trade war with one of the world’s largest economies. Then, Boeing’s self-inflicted wounds came in the form of the 21-month grounding of the 737 MAX, a 20-month suspension of deliveries of the 787, and major, slow rework required for each model.
On top of this, after Russia invaded Ukraine, the Biden Administration—which kept Trump’s tariffs upon taking office in 2021—ramped up the pressure on China, which initially covertly supported Russia’s war on Ukraine. This support became more open as the war dragged on.
Few Boeing airplanes have been delivered to China since 2017 and fewer orders have been placed.
Boeing predicts that China will need 6,720 single-aisle aircraft through 2043. Airbus sees a need for 7,950 single aisles for the same period. On the widebody side, Boeing forecasts a requirement for 1,575 aircraft; Airbus forecasts a need for 1,380. Widebody freighter forecasts for China are 170 and 190 by Boeing and Airbus, respectively.
Let’s compare these numbers with production rates. China still needs Boeing.
The A330 for medium haul or twice the frequency with A321XLR? Part 1
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
August 29, 2024, © Leeham News: We have compared the Airbus A321XLR to the Boeing 757 to see if it can replace the long-range single aisle on its trans-Atlantic routes. The result was convincing: The A321XLR is, in many respects, what the Boeing NMA should have been: a replacement for the 757 with additional range.
Now, we look at the short- to medium-range market and check whether a route that was previously only possible with the Airbus A330 can be flown with a fleet of A321XLRs. The advantage, at an equal per-passenger cost, is the doubling of the frequency to drive market growth, revenue, and margin.
Summary:
- The A321XLR is close to 50% of the passenger capacity of the A330-300/900 in a long-range configuration.
- It has most of the range of the A330-300 and can fly the bulk of the routes of an A330-900.
- Can an airline operate a dual daily A321XLR to a daily A330 at the same per-passenger cost?
Using stock could be one option for IAM salary demands
Subscription Required
By The Leeham News Team
Aug. 26, 2024, © Leeham News: Boeing’s in contract negotiations with its touch labor union, the International Association of Machinists District 751 (IAM 751). The powerful union wants a 40% raise over the life of a four-year contract. Leadership wants to recover medical co-pays and reinstate a defined pension plan, given up in previous contracts.
The union also wants a guarantee that the Next Boeing Airplane (NBA) will be built in the Seattle area. Boeing’s executives used the threats of relocating 737 MAX and 777X assembly elsewhere to wring economic concessions out of 751 members in previous contract talks.
The contract expires on September 12. The union membership already has voted to authorize a strike on September 12 if the contract offer is voted down.
This time, the membership believes it is in a stronger bargaining position. Boeing’s weak financial position is viewed as playing right into labor’s strength. Jon Holden, president of the union, echoed those sentiments. “We understand our power. We are ready to use it,” Holden told The Seattle Times. Holden was also not going to let management off the hook, due to the poor financial position Boeing finds itself in, he told the newspaper. “It’s not about whether they can afford to pay us. That’s not even a question,” he added. “They can.”
But the ultimate question is, How can Boeing afford to pay what the union wants?
Here’s how.