Observations on labor, Boeing

As we prepare to head off to the Paris Air Show, there have been a couple of important developments on the labor front with Boeing.

First, what we consider to be good news.

SPEEA, the engineers union representing Boeing workers primarily in Puget Sound but at a few Boeing facilities elsewhere, proposes entering binding arbitration on wages when contract negotiations begin next year. The contract is amendable at the end of 2012.

Boeing’s reaction is measured but encouraging:

“We are encouraged by this proposal and SPEEA’s offer for a dramatically changed way to negotiate a labor contract. We’ll need some time to review this proposal and engage in some serious internal discussions about it.

“We are in the process of setting up meetings with key SPEEA leaders to further discuss this concept.”

Now for the not-so-good news.
As entirely expected, the first day of the NLRB hearing on the IAM complaint that Boeing established 787 Line 2 in Charleston in retaliation for the 2008 strike was just procedural and didn’t go anywhere. The judge’s suggestion that the two sides settle their differences also went nowhere.
We’ve already expressed our view that the NLRB general counsel recommendations, and the IAM demands, are non-starters. Some other agreement is necessary to settle this matter, though we have no clue what might be acceptable to both sides.
Perhaps the IAM and Boeing should follow SPEEA’s lead and go with an arbitrator. We view settling this before the IAM contract negotiations begin next year to be imperative. Otherwise, this issue will cast a shadow over the negotiations that will only inflame things.

2 Comments on “Observations on labor, Boeing

  1. Groooan . . . Once again ( still) the media and Boeing and . . . have been sanbdbagged by the assumption that the Executive director runs SPEEA, and is automatically empowered by virtue of his title to speak on behalf of SPEEA.

    In this case-Mr Goforth made a “suggestion”, and sprung it as a surprise on the SPEEA Council and most of the E-Board. Accordingly- at this time it is NOT a ” SPEEA” proposal. It has NOT been discussed in detail, presented as a policy- motion- or agreement by the Council Officers, the E-Board, or any related committee.

    While the concept MAY have merit, it needs to be fully discussed and evaluated and presented to AT least the SPEEA and/or the Northwest Council.

    Although the SPEEA president and perhaps one other board member may have known about the SUGGESTION and ‘ approved” or ‘ allowed” Mr Goforth to present it to the SPEEA Council, it is NOT a SPEEA position.

    While that type of arbitration may be proper and useful for ‘ government” unions becasue of relatively known budget and expenditure issues being in the public domain, it may not be practical for dealing with private companies.

    New or different or better negotiations of course should be examined, but they should NOT be presented as a SPEEA position without the knowledge and approval by the membership OR their elected representatives.

    Unions are supposed to be the MOST democratic of organizations which assumes decisions are made by INFORMED voters ( members ).

  2. Boeing has no chance of winning while the complaint is with the union packed NLRB. They will appeal until it is settled by a real federal court that is truely unbiased.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *