June 6, 2017, © Leeham Co.: Low cost airlines, notably Norwegian Air, are increasingly getting into the long-haul business, but Finnair so far isn’t affected much.
Pekka Vauramo, president and CEO of the legacy airline, told LNC in an interview at the annual IATA conference yesterday that only about 10% of its routes face competition from the LCCs.
Most of its long-haul service heads east toward Asia, he said. Far fewer routes head west over the Atlantic, the prime target for the emerging LCC long-haul service.
The Trump Administration threatens to ban laptops and other electronics from carry-on, which would mean putting these into checked baggage or leaving them at home.
During an airline CEO panel yesterday, one official said that if the ban is enacted,
passengers should leave their laptops at home. Otherwise, he suggested, they could wind up in the bins with discarded water bottles before going through security checkpoints.
Vauramo doesn’t go this far.
“It will be complicated for sure, for passengers,” he said. “It will be for airlines, for airports, for everyone. When you look at what airlines have done and what passengers are already doing for security, there is a solution. We will find a solution.
“No one likes it. It will complicate traveling, but I don’t think it will stop traveling,” he said.
Checking 100 or 200 laptops powered by lithium-ion batteries holds more risk for fire than the risk level of a terrorist bringing a bomb on board, though the choice is hardly one likes to think about.
“True,” Vauramo said. “There are risks relating to [checking laptops]. I’m sure there is a solution even for that one. We have to think about what the solution is.
“I have to say we know too little about the reasons why this is being proposed. Only after knowing the reason can one start thinking about how to avoid those risks,” he said.
Finnair, an early customer for deliveries of the Airbus A350, suffered from delays because interior supplier Zodiac fell far behind in getting its seats and other components to Airbus for installation. Airbus continues to face these difficulties, but Finnair’s airplanes on now being delivered on time.
Vauramo said the Zodiac seats are fine, but during assembly of the A350s, delays on delivering other components, such as panels, led to out-of-sequence installations. The additional manual labor contributed to the slower deliveries.
“There’s a lot of rework that needs to be done,” he said. “You buy a new aircraft and you expect that to be perfect. If there is a very visible defect, it is visible to the passengers.”
In contrast to the mercurial Akbar Al Baker, CEO of Qatar Airways and the launch customer for the A350, Finnair’s concerns remained below the radar. Al Baker, who is notorious for complaining about Airbus, Boeing and just about anyone else, went public over and over about the A350’s lack of perfection. He initially refused to accept the first ones off the line.
Vauramo said that had he known about Zodiac’s difficulties in advance, he wouldn’t have bought from the company. He’s unsure if he will buy from Zodiac in the future.
Realities of medium-longhaul LLC routes will make travelers realize the meaning of “penny wise pound foolish”?
A good analogy. When I was younger I went on a holiday to south east Asia and spent something like $300 on all living expenses including accommodation over 2 weeks and was enriched by a new culture. Lots of nordics head to places like Thailand for a sun break and with Helsinki only a short hop from any of those places you can have a wonderful holiday for less.
Also, Finland probably has the best education system in the western hemisphere and appreciates the potential in opening business opportunities with Asia. They have 20 Asian destinations, including several in big Chinese metropolises. Helsinki is now essentailly a regional hub to link northern Europe with Asia. They dont fly to Qatar (One World partner) which would seem to indicate that they have ambitions to further grow traffic between Europe and Asia through Helsinki.
If true, travelers would hv realized that about longhaul LCCs a long time ago. I mean e.g., Norwegian LongHaul started ops 4yrs ago and has grown significantly larger since their LGW base came online 3yrs ago. Medium/Longhaul LCCs like JetStar Int’l and AirAsiaX started even earlier. That’s plenty of time for consumers to test/prove the theoretical “penny wise pound foolish” outcome re traveling with longhaul LCCs and then deserted such LCCs in droves.
However, it didn’t happened. Consumers not only continued to fill up those longhaul LCC cabins @ handsome load factors yr-round but also prompted longhaul LCCs to expand even faster than b4(e.g. Norwegian LongHaul).
Perhaps travelers willingly buy longhaul LCC tickets because in today’s
interactive social media age, they actually know what they are getting themselves into than some folks imagined?
Horses for courses I guess, but believe that the low cost market could reach saturation in the not so distance future and see a swing back to the Legacy carriers?
Helsinki is a “short hop” from Thailand?? This seems like an unusual definition of “short”. 🙂
Finnair CEO: “only about 10% of its routes face competition from the LCCs.”
Norwegian LongHaul will compete with Finnair for the remaining 90% of Finnair intercon routes circa 2020.
Norwegian is already @ BKK and soon SIN competing with HEL-BKK and HEL-SIN by Finnair. I don’t think those 787 x18 scheduled to join Norwegian LongHaul fleet fm now till 2020 are all intended for Trans-Atl expansion because their upcoming Max8/321LR can also cover that role(but not Europe-E.Asia routes)……
Norwegian Long haul ( actually an Irish airline inspite of the name) will have to vacate UK airports because of Brexit- unless they are doing Europe -UK flights.