It’s now official: Boeing submitted a bid for the KC-X competition, offering the KC-767 NewGen tanker.
Boeing did not schedule a press conference, so the initial press release detailing its bid is below the jump, with our reporting following the PR.
ST. LOUIS, July 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — The Boeing Company today submitted a proposal to the U.S. Air Force to provide the service with a next-generation aerial refueling tanker aircraft. Based on Boeing’s 767 commercial airplane, the NewGen Tanker would replace 179 of the 400 Eisenhower-era KC-135 aircraft currently in the Air Force fleet.
The 8,000-page NewGen Tanker proposal, hand-delivered to the KC-X program office at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, offers an American-made, 767-based multi-mission tanker that will satisfy all 372 mandatory Air Force requirements and be capable, survivable, and combat-ready at the lowest cost to the taxpayer. The proposal was created by an integrated “One Boeing” team from various sites across the company, including employees from the Commercial Airplanes; Defense, Space & Security; and Engineering, Operations & Technology organizations.
“We are honored to support our U.S. Air Force customer and submit this proposal to meet the critical mission needs of this nation,” said Dennis Muilenburg, president and CEO of Boeing Defense, Space & Security. “Boeing has more than 60 years of experience developing, manufacturing and supporting tankers for America’s warfighters, and we’re ready to build the NewGen Tanker now. This revolutionary tanker will deliver widebody capabilities in a narrowbody footprint, operate in any theater or from any base, and – with the lowest operating cost of any tanker in the competition – save the Air Force and the American taxpayers billions of dollars.”
“As the only company in this competition with rich experience in developing and manufacturing derivative aircraft for the warfighter, Boeing brings the talent and resources of our existing team and facilities to fully meet the requirements of the U.S. Air Force,” said Jim Albaugh, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. “With our Boeing commercial and defense teams and a proven supplier network, we have delivered more than 1,000 commercial derivative aircraft to U.S. government customers and military customers around the world. Add to that our experience as the only company to deliver a combat-tested aerial refueling boom, and we are ready to provide the right tanker for the Air Force and the best value for taxpayers.”
Based on the proven Boeing 767 commercial aircraft, the NewGen Tanker is a widebody, multi-mission aircraft updated with the latest and most advanced technology and capable of meeting or exceeding the Air Force’s needs for transport of fuel, cargo, passengers and patients. It includes state-of-the-art systems to meet the demanding mission requirements of the future, including a digital flight deck featuring Boeing 787 Dreamliner electronic displays and a cockpit-design philosophy that places the pilot in command rather than allowing computer software to limit combat maneuverability. The NewGen Tanker also features an advanced KC-10 boom with an expanded refueling envelope, increased fuel offload rate and fly-by-wire control system.
More cost-effective to own and operate than the larger and heavier Airbus A330 Tanker being offered by the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. (EADS), the Boeing NewGen Tanker will save American taxpayers more than $10 billion in fuel costs alone over its 40-year service life because it burns 24 percent less fuel. The Boeing tanker also will cost 15 to 20 percent less to maintain than the A330, which means it will save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in maintenance costs.
Nationwide, the NewGen Tanker will support approximately 50,000 total U.S. jobs with Boeing and more than 800 suppliers in more than 40 states. That is tens of thousands more jobs in the United States than an Airbus A330 tanker that is designed and largely manufactured in Europe.
Boeing has the capacity and capability to meet the production rate at whatever level the Air Force determines – with a low-risk approach to manufacturing that relies on a trained and experienced U.S. work force and existing Boeing facilities in Washington state and Kansas. Boeing will use a proven and cost-effective in-line production system similar to that used on the company’s successful P-8 program for the U.S. Navy.
In addition to building the U.S. Air Force KC-135 and KC-10 fleets, Boeing has delivered four KC-767Js to the Japan Air Self-Defense Force and is on contract to deliver four KC-767As to the Italian Air Force.
To learn more about the NewGen Tanker and Boeing’s bid for the KC-X tanker competition, visit www.UnitedStatesTanker.com.
From our perspective, a key element to the offering is the plan by Boeing to shift the 767 production line in Everett to a Lean Manufacturing approach. This will cut production costs by about 20%, Boeing told us when the plan was first announced around the first of the year. (Note: this does not necessarily translate to a 20% lower airplane cost since parts going into the airplanes continue to rise with prices and costs at suppliers.) This will help Boeing lower the cost of its offering in what is now a price shoot-out demanded by the USAF.
Furthermore, the appointment of Jim Albaugh as president of Boeing Commercial Aircraft (BCA) from his position as CEO of what was then called Boeing Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) will help, too.
Previous BCA president Scott Carson is reliably reported to have held firm on pricing by BCA to IDS for the 767 platform for the profits at BCA. In the byzantine way of doing things at Boeing, BCA sells the platform to IDS and IDS adds the military hardware and then sells the airplane to the USAF. Carson demanded a profit on the BCA sale to IDS, which then had to mark up everything to USAF. (Can you say Northrop Grumman and EADS?)
Now, with Albaugh at BCA, forget this approach. There will be one profit for The Boeing Co.
In a pre-Farnborough Air Show press briefing last month, Boeing said that the profit-on-profit concept is history.While Boeing did not detail how the intra-company sale will be handled between BCA and what is now called Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS), it was clear the plan is a profit for The Boeing Co. and not “profit-on-profit.”
Separately, Albaugh has vowed he doesn’t plan to be the man to lose the tanker competition twice.
Boeing’s press release makes it clear price is the emphasis. It finishes up with reference to its experienced workforce and mature facilities, which is an oblique shot at the fact that EADS/Airbus doesn’t have a facility nor experienced workers at the planned Mobile (AL) site where an assembly plant must be built. To us, this is one of the strongest points Boeing has in this competition.
As this writing, Boeing’s tanker blog hasn’t been updated; we’ll update our posting to reflect any new information from the Boeing blog.
Addison Schonland is scheduled to conduct a podcast with BDS. We’ll be out of the office and unable to post a link when he does it, so check his main podcast page after 12n PDT today.
As long as they keep the John S Mc Dummy crowd and his Korporate Kulture of Mendacity as far away as possible, Boeing may just have a chance.
Along with the Scott Carson types who work on the ‘ not out of MY budget principle.
Hopefully, the power point rangers have been vetted.
Airbus may not be able to win- but Boeing could lose .
Keeping fingers crossed and posterior puckered . .
“[…]the Boeing NewGen Tanker will save American taxpayers more than $10 billion in fuel costs alone over its 40-year service life because it burns 24 percent less fuel.”
I hope Boeing’s engineers got better math skills than the PR department.
The study often citied and paid by Boeing says A330-200 consumes 24 % MORE fuel per hour than a B767-200. According to this statement above an A330-200 would consume 31 % MORE.
Boeing always missed to mention several other points hidden inside the study. The B767-200 used for comparison is about 15,000 lbs lighter than their tanker. Also economic cruise speed is about 2.5 % higher for A330. So according to Boeing’s figures it’s just 21 % more fuel per trip neglecting the additional weight of KC-767. On all categories a KC-45 provides at least 30 % more. So for 21 % more you get 30 % more. Make your choice.
When will we know something more about what was offered today?
How does a KC-767NG or KC-45 look like?
I would suspect the 767 tankers already flying can provide a closer comparison to the proposed model. The addition of aeropartners winglets probably make up more than the weight differences in the AF version compared to the italian or japan verson.
Thus their comments/claims are probably based on more extensive data than a simple commercial comparison would provide.
AFIK- the comparisons re fuel burn are to be based on a unit WITHOUT wing mounted drogues.
+++++ Breaking News ++++++
Payerne, Switzerland 2010-07-09
“Solar Impulse” experimental aircraft managed to fly longer than 24 h. It is the first time, that a manned, purely solar powered plane has been able to keep flying all over night until the solar cells were able again to replenish the accumulators with solar power the next day.
The HB-SIA plane, which took off from Switzerland, has the weight of a family car but the wingspan of a big airliner.
The test flight was initially due to take place last week but was postponed because of a technical problem.
“For seven years now, the whole team has been passionately working to achieve this first decisive step of the project,” said pilot Andre Borschberg as he entered the cockpit at an airfield in Payerne, in the west of Switzerland.
He is to take the aircraft to an altitude of 27,900ft (8,500m) by late Wednesday, when the sun’s rays stop being strong enough to supply the solar cells with energy.
The prototype will then start a slow descent using energy stored in its batteries until sunrise.
“The big question is whether the pilot can make efficient use of the battery energy to fly throughout the night,” the team said in a statement.
“If this mission is successful, it will be the longest and highest flight ever made by a solar plane.”
Circumnavigation of the Earth planned for 2013
The plane, which has 12,000 solar cells, is the latest step in the Solar Impulse project, which Mr Borschberg leads with his business partner and fellow adventurer, Bertrand Piccard. They have worked on the project for seven years.
Mr Piccard made the first non-stop circumnavigation of the globe in a balloon in 1999.
The pair want to prove that solar power has a practical future in aviation and, more generally, in powering society at large.
The plane incorporates composite materials to keep it extremely light, and uses super-efficient solar cells, batteries, motors and propellers to keep itself in the sky.
The vehicle was unveiled last year and has since been undergoing daylight trials. The first full-day flight was completed on 7 April.
The HB-SIA will be succeeded by HB-SIB. It is likely to be bigger, and will incorporate a pressurised capsule and better avionics.
The group plans to use this vehicle in two years’ time to make the first manned transatlantic solar flight, followed in 2013 by an even more daring circumnavigation of the Earth.
Meanwhile, U.S. Aerospace, Inc. and Antonov today announced that they have submitted a bid to the U.S. Air Force to supply 179 aerial refueling tankers at $150 Million per plane, with a total bid package of $29.55 Billion including research and development costs. 😉
oh for pete’s sake.