By Scott Hamilton
May 20, 2025, © Leeham News: Boeing will release its fourth annual safety report this month. The first was in 2022.
The document is the Chief Aerospace Safety Officer Report (CASO Report). Previous CASO reports outlined programs Boeing adopted since the 2019 737 MAX grounding and safety crises emerged across Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
Quality control, safety protocols, intimidation, retribution, and retaliation against line workers were highlighted during the MAX accident investigations and whistleblowing accusations at the Renton, Everett (WA), and Charleston (SC) production plants.
Quality control at Spirit AeroSystems, which builds the 737 fuselage and nose sections of the other 7-Series commercial airliners, also emerged as an issue.
The Federal Aviation Administration’s cooperation with Boeing and transfer of inspection and quality authority also came under scrutiny. The FAA revoked Boeing’s “ticketing authority” to certify 737s and 787s as airworthy before delivery, assuming this role itself. FAA inspectors clamped down on Boeing, reviewing previous work and overseeing production lines.
There is no end in sight for the FAA to relax its grip on Boeing. Boeing must meet six Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) before the FAA is convinced that the company has its house in order, allowing production rates to return to pre-MAX grounding levels and boost production for the 787. These KPIs are:
Source: Boeing.
The 2024 CASO Report is expected to update these topics and more.
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
May 15, 2025, © Leeham News: The aerospace industry is a maintenance-intensive operation, where strict regulatory rules drive many requirements.
Assets must be constantly maintained, governed by the time or usage an airline derives from them.
This goes for airframes, engines, and human resources.
Services account for a large part of aerospace corporate profits. Boeing’s Global Services division is the most profitable part of the company. Photo credit: Boeing Global Services.
Some equipment manufacturers derive little or no profits from product sales, but they make lucrative and long-term revenues from attached maintenance contracts.
Political factors are also coming into play in the services segment.
As airlines are forced into a difficult and expensive decision regarding the payment of tariffs on new aircraft they acquire, many could opt for a different strategy.
Older aircraft that were due for replacement with newer, more fuel-efficient jets will be sent into MRO facilities for an additional heavy-maintenance check.
With falling fuel prices playing less of a factor in the acquisition decision, airlines will be tempted to defer deliveries (thus avoiding the payment of tariffs) using their current assets in their installed fleets.
Extending an aircraft’s useful life by another six to seven years will allow carriers to simply wait out the tariff threat when things return to normal.
LNA looks into the growing services revenue segment among various companies in the aviation industry.
By Scott Hamilton
April 29, 2025, © Leeham News: One down, two more to go this year.
The Teamsters Local 174 and Boeing have a new contract. Union members ratified a new contract on April 19. Results were announced on April 21. Local 174 represents about 300 truck drivers for Boeing in the greater Seattle region. A strike could have disrupted production.
The union said the “contract materially surpasses all previous contracts for the group. The new agreement, which not only makes major language improvements but also guarantees economic victories that raise the bar for the rest of the industry, comes on the heels of labor disputes between Boeing and the International Association of Firefighters and the International Association of Machinists.
“Contrary to those negotiations, bargaining with the Teamsters took an entirely different tone, and the resulting Agreement will protect and reward Boeing Teamsters for years to come.”
Related Story
Boeing faces three labor contracts this year
By Scott Hamilton
Reconfiguring aircraft interiors is a costly and time-consuming challenge. Aftermarket company ATS is one of those engaged in this sector. It explains the process here. Credit: ATS.
April 28, 2025, © Leeham News: China used to be Boeing’s most important single collective customer. By the end of 2016, this country’s airlines and lessors accounted for between 25% and 33% of Boeing’s annual deliveries, depending on the year.
Boeing was losing ground to Airbus there. The European rival aggressively sought to partner with China. In 2008, the company opened an A320 family final assembly line in Tianjin. This followed a long courtship in which Airbus boosted its supply chain and engineering in China. Airbus establishing an A330 finishing center in China in 2017.
In China, doing business there meant providing “benefit” to its new and growing industries. “Benefit” was a loosely defined term that generally meant transferring technology, helping create a supply chain and ordering parts and components made in China. For some, it meant providing kickbacks. (This is not suggesting Airbus engaged in kickbacks, but corruption is a matter of public record. Such was suggested to me when I was doing business in China between 1989 and 1993.)
It had been a long struggle. When Airbus was establishing its presence there selling airplanes, some officials said they didn’t need any air buses—passengers boarded by jet bridges. Over time, Airbus began to surpass Boeing’s orders in China and today is the leader.
Boeing recognized it needed to do more in China. It floated the idea of establishing a 737 final assembly line in China, but its touch-labor union, the IAM 751 exercised its veto contract clause to stop the idea. Instead, Boeing opened a 737 completion center in China in 2018.
Completion centers paint the airplanes and install the interiors. A few 737s were at Boeing’s completion center when President Trump started the tariff war with China; the airplanes returned to the United States.
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
April 24, 2025, © Leeham News: We started looking at the future COMAC C929 widebody 10 days ago. The C929 development has gone through a number of challenges, the first being how to structure the cooperation between China’s COMAC and Russia’s United Aircraft, with the latest being what engines to use for the aircraft.
The first problem was solved by COMAC deciding to go it alone, whereas the last problem around engines has no definite solution yet.
By Karl Sinclair
April 23, 2025, © Leeham News: China represents 10% of Boeing’s commercial airliner backlog,
CFO Brian West clarified on the Boeing 1Q2025 earnings call. About 50 aircraft are scheduled to be delivered to China this year, but all are in limbo due to President Donald Trump’s trade war tariff fight, which began this month.
Previously thought to represent some 2% of the commercial backlog, with another 2%- 3% added for lessors, it was revealed that China represents 10% of the Boeing (BA) backlog. There are 130 Boeing jets identified in the backlog destined for China. With 6,319 Unidentified orders, about 500 are placed by China’s airlines and lessors.
“We have roughly 50 airplanes in our plan this year going into China, so we’re going to be pretty pragmatic with what we do here. For those airplanes that haven’t been built yet, we’ll be looking to maybe redirect those to other customers. For the airplanes that have been built, we call it re-marketing,” said Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg on the CNBC financial network this morning.
Re-marketing, as Ortberg puts it, can be a costly endeavour.
At the end of FY2024, Boeing still had 50 aircraft in inventory (40 for China) it needed to “re-market.”
The 737 MAX program also incurred abnormal production costs and write-offs of ~$22bn since the grounding.
It was revealed that Boeing also had four 787s in production destined for China.
Holding onto inventory, especially commercial aircraft that need to be maintained, can be an expensive exercise.
By Karl Sinclair
April 23, 2025, © Leeham News: As aircraft destined for delivery for airlines in China were turned around and returned to the US, the Boeing Company (BA) released 1Q2025 results today. Results were better than expected, with the loss lower than forecast and Free Cash Flow better than analysts forecast.
Revenue in the quarter was $19.5bn, the loss per share before charges was 49 cents and free cash flow, while negative at $2.3bn, was well below analyst projections.
Boeing ended the quarter with $23.7bn in cash and marketable securities, down from $26.3bn on Dec. 31. Debt was $53.6bn, down slightly from the end of last year. Boeing has an untapped $10bn line of credit.
The company said it still expects to return to a new production rate on the 737 MAX line of 38/mo. Production for the 787, how at 5/mo, is forecast to go to 7/mo this year. Both figures are lower than previously targeted (42/mo and 10/mo, respectively).
Yesterday, Boeing announced that it had reached a deal with Thoma Bravo – a software investment firm, to spin-off parts of the company for $10.55bn in cash. The deal includes Jeppesen, ForeFlight, AerData and OzRunways assets, and is expected to close by the end of 2025.
By Scott Hamilton
April 22, 2025, © Leeham News: Boeing released an employee survey last week about safety, culture, and related items. Some areas recorded improvements, while others recorded declines.
But the survey data released did not address a serious problem Boeing has had for more than two decades and continues to have, despite efforts to improve safety, quality and culture: the “deep state” that exists within Boeing at the middle- and lower-officer levels that continue to practice intimidation and retaliation against some who attempt to point out problems in the areas listed above.
In interviews for LNA and my forthcoming book, The Rise and Fall of Boeing and the Way Back, it was clear that Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg’s initial rounds of housecleaning at the executive and some lower levels haven’t scratched the surface of the root of the company’s problems that have brought this icon to its proverbial knees.
Rise and Fall is essentially a sequel to my first book, Air Wars, The Global Combat Between Airbus and Boeing, published in September 2021. Rise and Fall is in final copy editing, with a target publishing date in September, the fourth anniversary of Air Wars’ publication.
Boeing’s release of its recent survey last week presents a contrast in contradictions.
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
At its peak, there were 140 Boeing 737 MAXes stored across Washington state destined for China. The number is now around 40, and with the tariff war, there is no telling when these will be delivered. Photo in March 2023 in Moses Lake (WA) by Scott Hamilton.
April 21, 2025, © Leeham News: Just when it looked like The Boeing Company (BA) had a sensible recovery plan and leadership that understood the tasks at hand, along came that pocket of turbulent air, which upset a smooth flight.
Boeing announces its 1Q2025 financial numbers on Wednesday. What had been hoped to be a positive report is now overshadowed by the impact of worldwide tariffs, announced by President Donald Trump on April 2.
The latest industry news, which seems to change daily, is that the Trump Administration has levied a 245% tariff on China, after China had retaliated against tariffs of 145%. Last week, Beijing reportedly told its airlines to refuse delivery of all Boeing products.
In the interim, Trump walked back exorbitant tariff rates applied to nearly 100 nations, calculated with a flawed theory, focusing instead on hitting China hard and retaining a blanket 10% rate on the rest of the world.
There was a further retreat as tariffs on electronics were removed on iPhones and tablets, as pressures in the bond market forced a move.
Nothing in the aviation industry operates in a vacuum, as corporations begin to circle the wagons.
Delta Air Lines will refuse to take any Airbus aircraft that are tariffed, according to CEO Ed Bastian. Ryanair’s CEO Michael O’Leary said the same, regarding Boeing aircraft.
Howmet Aerospace, a Tier 1 supplier, is preparing to use “force majeure,” a legal term referring to an unexpected event which prevents a party from fulfilling contractual obligations, to get out of delivering parts.
According to equity research firm Bernstein, other suppliers are expected to invoke the clause as needed.
This is only 17 days after Trump’s much-heralded “Liberation Day.”