Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- Bjorn’s Corner: New engine development. Part 28. Wrapup. October 11, 2024
- Boeing strike hits suppliers, Airbus steps in October 10, 2024
- Boeing-IAM contract talks fail, no new negotiations scheduled, no end in sight October 9, 2024
- Boeing 3Q deliveries up despite strike October 8, 2024
- Strike slows Boeing’s march toward improving safety culture October 7, 2024
Boeing strike hits suppliers, Airbus steps in
- Strike creates gap for suppliers.
- Airbus places accelerated orders at some affected suppliers.
- Snapping up capacity may complicate Boeing’s post-strike recovery.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 10, 2024, © Leeham News: There is no end in sight for the strike by the International Association of Machines and Aerospace Workers, District 751, ending its fourth week today.
The strike costs Boeing between $50m and $150m a day, depending on whose estimate you believe. (The world will have an understanding of the cost on Oct. 23, when Boeing reports its third-quarter financial results.)
A strike by the IAM 751 in 2008 lasted 57 days. Boeing lost an estimated $6bn in sales during this period and racked up more than $2bn in lost cash flow. It took Boeing about two years to fully recover from the strike. Then, Boeing didn’t have the overhang that it has today from five years of crises and an irate Federal Aviation Administration that oversees and restricts Boeing’s production.
But recovery, whenever it begins, has a new wrinkle that didn’t exist in 2008. Then, it was Airbus that was in disarray. Its A380 program was in shambles due to production issues. The fledging A350, Airbus’ answer to the Boeing 787, was being redesigned and tweaked for the fourth or fifth time due to poor market reception. The A400M program was an operational and financial disaster.
Today, Airbus is playing from a position of strength and dominance. Boeing is playing from a position of weakness and financial trauma.
Strike slows Boeing’s march toward improving safety culture
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Credit: Federal Aviation Administration.
Oct. 7, 2024, © Leeham News: With the strike at Boeing by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 751 nearing its fourth week, progress in improving the safety culture is one of the areas that has slowed.
Boeing initiated a company-wide furlough to stem cash outflow during the strike. Among those laid off were people in the Chief Aerospace Safety Office, The Seattle Times reported on Sept. 19.
“[O]ne particular set of nonunion employees were surprised to learn they will be among those subject to the rolling furloughs,” the newspaper reported.
“That’s those in Boeing’s Chief Aerospace Safety Office — responsible for the company’s implementation of Congressional legislation that raised safety standards and setting up a new companywide safety management system.”
The Safety Office was created in 2021 in the fallout from the 2018-19 737 MAX crisis and continuing revelations of shortcomings in safety protocols and quality assurances on assembly lines in Washington State and South Carolina. It’s headed by Mike Delaney, a career Boeing employee.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has come down hard on Boeing to improve its safety culture and quality control.
Related Stories
The IAM 751 and Boeing in 2019 proposed a safety reporting program called ASAP, which stands for Aviation Safety Action Program. It took three years of negotiations before it was adopted. Two years later, union president Jon Holden said implementation was still in its early stages.
Boeing’s engineer and technicians union, SPEEA, early this year proposed a similar ASAP program, But in April, the union claimed it and Boeing was at an impasse over how the program would work. Negotiations between SPEEA and the company were held by Boeing’s labor relations department, not the Safety Office.
Boeing’s labor negotiators now have the strike to contend with. With the Safety Office employees subject to rolling furloughs, progress on improving the company’s safety culture has slowed. SPEEA’s lead negotiator is now occupied with contract talks at Spirit AeroSystems, a major Boeing supplier. SPEEA also represents the engineers and technicians there.
Rival Airbus has its safety protocols from which Boeing might benefit as an example to follow.
Aerospace supply chain still ailing; Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to go green
- Aerospace supply chain is still in recovery.
- Suppliers in Russia had to be closed. What happens if the same happens in China?
- Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to green aviation. Innovation in engine and airframe design is.
- US government must step up funding to go green.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 4, 2024, © Leeham News: RTX, maker of the Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbo Fan engine and a large supplier to Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and others through various divisions, continues to struggle with its supply chain.
CEO Greg Hayes told the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit last month that “as much as we had contingency plans for pandemics, and I go back to the early 2000s with SARS and how the airlines managed through that, we were completely unprepared for COVID. Absolutely completely. There was no playbook.
“How do you keep your employees safe? How do you keep the airlines flying, despite the fact that there were very few passengers? How do you maintain all of your systems?”
Southwest Airlines Slashing Capacity Growth Shakes Up Their Fleet Plan
Subscription Required
By Chris Sloan
Sept. 30, 2024, © Leeham News: Southwest Airlines outlined significant moves in its quest to return to sustained profitability at its investor day on September 26 in Dallas. Widely reported revenue and financial initiatives include assigned and premium seating, network realignment, capacity growth cuts, and staffing reductions.
Billed as Southwest Even Better, the plan is the most transformational program in the company’s 53-year history, according to Chief Executive Officer Bob Jordan. “The plan includes a robust set of tactical and strategic initiatives and elements uniquely available only to Southwest Airlines. The plan is capital efficient and supports achieving our financial goal of ROIC [Return on Invested Capital], well above our cost of capital,” he said. Yet, he acknowledged that recent financial performance is not up to anyone’s expectations. “Our model is not broken, but it needs continued calibration and enhancement.” By 2027, the plan is expected to add approximately $4 bn in cumulative incremental earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).
Jordan pointed to external factors as a significant culprit, notably Boeing. “It’s no secret that Boeing’s delivery delays have created significant issues for us, making it very difficult for us to run a business. Boeing has delivered very few MAX aircraft on time, and we are still waiting on the MAX 7 certification.” Though compensation agreements remain confidential, “Past financial issues caused by Boeing delivery delays and other Boeing issues have largely been resolved through the application of credits on future deliveries,” said Jordan.
Southwest is taking dramatic steps to mitigate “operational risk” by reducing hiring and cutting annual capacity growth to 1-2 percent through 2027. “We expect production issues at Boeing and issues related to the (Pratt & Whitney) Geared Turbofan engine to continue to constrain industry growth for years to come,” Jordan noted.
Heart Aerospace’s revised ES-30
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 26, 2024, © Leeham News: Heart Aerospace has revised its environmentally friendly aircraft for the third time. The variants started in September 2020, when Heart presented an all-electric, battery-based 19-seat airliner that should test fly by now and be available in 2026, Figure 1, top aircraft.
Two years later, in September 2022, it all changed. The aircraft was changed to a 30-seater with a serial hybrid propulsion system using turboextenders to increase the operational range, Figure 1, aircraft two.
After another 20 months, the configuration changed again to the third iteration in Figure 1, which will fly in prototype in 2026 and be available to airlines in 2029.
In an article series, we explain the reasons for these changes and analyze whether the changes in the aircraft have increased the likelihood of the ES-30 entering the market in 2029.
Figure 1. The Heart Aerospace regional airliner series. Top, the ES-19, then the ES-30, and finally, the revised ES-30. Source: Heart Aerospace.
Summary:
- Heart Aerospace has followed the typical trajectory for an electric aircraft startup.
- It begins with an all-electric, battery-based airliner that will change regional flying.
- Gradually, reality sets in, and all-battery architecture becomes a serial hybrid and, finally, a parallel hybrid.
- We analyze if the evolution trail increases the chances we will fly on Heart Aerospace airliners come 2030.
Boeing’s shareholders: which do you prefer? Dilution or bankruptcy?
By Scott Hamilton
Sept. 23, 2024, © Leeham News: A Wells Fargo analyst calculated The Boeing Co. might have to issue 190 million shares of stock to get itself out of the financial mess it’s in.
At the $155 range Boeing’s stock has been recently trading, which would be just shy of $30bn.
Last week, Barron’s (a financial publication) wrote that Boeing has too much debt and perhaps a $10bn equity offering would suffice.
The Wells Fargo analyst and Barron’s complained that issuing stock would hurt shareholders due to the dilution.
On Sept. 12, the day Boeing’s IAM 751 union rejected the Tentative Agreement for a new labor contract and voted to strike at midnight, LNA did a deep dive analysis of the Wells Fargo equity speculation and the increasing speculation that Boeing might be forced into bankruptcy if the strike lasts a long time.
Before that, LNA analyzed the net debt levels, how long it would take to pay it down, and the annual interest to be paid.
Boeing’s financial position is precarious. It needs $10bn in cash to run the company; on June 30, the end of the second quarter, it had $12bn in cash. It’s losing an estimated $100m a day during the strike.
Wall Street types wring their hands over the dilution of a possible stock offering. This begs the question: would they prefer dilution or bankruptcy, which typically wipes out shareholders?
Or would they prefer at least a decade of stagnation while Boeing tries to operationally repair its balance sheet?
LNA welcomes the idea of a $30bn equity offering.
Boeing won’t fully recover without drastic action. And a massive equity offering best fits this need.
Related Stories
- Boeing has too much debt. (Barron’s)
- IAM rejects contract, strikes at midnight
- Boeing’s liabilities problem: a decade to resolve
- Melius analyst report: The Strike is a Symptom of a Bigger Problem
The A330neo for medium haul or twice the frequency with A321XLR? Part 3
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 19, 2024, © Leeham News: We examine the high-volume short-to-medium-range market and check whether a route previously reserved for the Airbus A330 can be flown with a fleet of A321XLRs. At equal per-passenger operational costs, doubling the frequency is advantageous and can drive market growth, revenue, and margin.
After comparing passenger only operating costs, such as per seat mile Cash Operating Costs (COC), we add cargo to the mix. To compare efficiency, we then need to do a route margin comparison.
Summary:
- When we add cargo to the revenue mix, the A321XLR’s limited cargo capability makes it a less attractive alternative for routes with cargo traffic.
- The A321XLR is still an interesting alternative for routes with few cargo opportunities and where route frequency can motivate higher passenger yields.
Why the IAM 751 rejected the Boeing contract and what is needed for approval
Subscription Required
By the Leeham News Team
Analysis
Sept. 16, 2024, © Leeham News — The lopsided outcome of last week’s vote by the International Association of Machinists District 751 union members to resoundingly reject Boeing’s four-year contract offer caught a lot of observers by surprise, including us.
Not that we didn’t expect the offer would be rejected. That seemed a reasonable bet. But if anyone tells you their Magic 8 ball had predicted a 94.6% vote to reject the contract and a 96% vote to strike, they’re overstating.
Our industry sources tell us that Boeing management was utterly gobsmacked by the result. Even the union staffers and officers we talked to on the night of the vote were surprised.
The result is now that some 33,000 751 members spent the weekend on picket lines surrounding Boeing facilities in Washington state, Oregon, and Edwards Air Force Base in California.
And Boeing management, which had very little leverage going into these contract talks, has approximately zero leverage now.
The problem, for everyone in our industry hoping for a quick resolution of this strike, is that Boeing has been acting since intensive talks started in August like it doesn’t understand how little leverage it has over the union this year. Despite new CEO Kelly Ortberg’s factory floor visits and talk about a “reset” with the unions at Boeing, Boeing acted like it believes it’s still 2014 when it won a bitter fight for a contract amendment granting concessions in exchange for locating the 777X final assembly line in Everett (WA).
Maybe Thursday night’s results will be the moment Boeing’s labor relations strategy needs if it’s ever going to solve its interconnected safety, quality, reputational, and cash-flow problems.
Summary
- What’s the latest
- Why the offer failed
- At the table
- Where we are
- How does this end?
IAM rejects Boeing contract, strikes at midnight
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
Sept. 12, 2024, © Leeham News: Boeing’s largest union today rejected a four-year contract and approved a walk-out beginning at midnight tonight.
The vote to reject the contract and go on strike were overwhelming: 94.6% to reject the contract, 96% for the strike.
For financially ailing Boeing, a strike is the last thing it needs. When the union, IAM 751, last struck in 2008, the walk-out lasted 57 days and set the foundation for labor wars that continued to this day. Then-CEO Jim McNerney the following year located the second 787 assembly line in South Carolina. (The first line, in Everett, was closed during the COVID pandemic.) In 2011, McNerney threatened to build the 737 MAX elsewhere if 751 members didn’t approve a contract amendment with concessions. He repeated the process in 2013 and 2014 with the 777X development. The latter was the second amendment to the 2008 labor contract that governed wages and benefits for the huge union, which represents workers at Boeing’s factories in Renton and Everett, home to the 737 and 767/KC-46A and 777, respectively. The IAM 751 also represents workers at other Boeing locations.
Union leadership want to recover benefit concessions and sharply increase wages that failed to keep up with inflation. They wanted a guarantee that the next Boeing airplane will be assembled in Puget Sound (the greater Seattle area). They wanted a seat on the Board of Directors and a role in changing Boeing’s failed safety culture.
Management wanted to hold the line. The company remains in a loss-making position, led by the continuing turmoil at Boeing Commercial Airplanes. The defense unit, which is not represented by 751, also is bleeding profits. The two units caused Boeing to burn through nearly $10bn in cash in the first half of this year alone. Only the services unit is making money, but not nearly enough to offset the losses and negative cash flows at the other two units.
More losses and negative cash flow is expected for the quarter ending this month. Company CFO Brian West speaks at a Morgan Stanley investors conference tomorrow. His will be the first detailed response to the union vote, whatever the outcome.
Internally, Boeing prepared for a 2-12 week strike.
Some observers fear that a long strike could shove Boeing into bankruptcy. LNA doesn’t agree, but we’ve nevertheless analyzed the prospect.
The A330neo for medium haul or twice the frequency with A321XLR? Part 2
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 12, 2024, © Leeham News: We examine the high-volume short-to-medium-range market and check whether a route previously reserved for the Airbus A330neo can be flown with a fleet of A321XLRs. At equal per-passenger operational costs, doubling the frequency is advantageous and can drive market growth, revenue, and margin.
After comparing the aircraft and their seating, we now use our Airliner Performance and Cost Model (APCM) to fly them on a Southeast Asia route and compare the operating costs.
Summary:
- The A321XLR is competitive on fuel costs but loses out on Cash costs as several cost factors don’t scale linearly with passenger capacity.
- The cost disadvantage doesn’t render the A321XLR a non-replacement for an A330-900; it just needs a positive revenue uptick from the frequency increase to be an interesting alternative.