Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 28. June 27, 2025
- Parent agency, FAA often at odds as politics outweighs safety June 26, 2025
- Electric Flight and the Ugly Duckling June 25, 2025
- Engine makers tout “Plan A” but have “Plan B” backups in R&D June 23, 2025
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 27. June 20, 2025
Airbus looks to larger A220, insists not a threat to A320
Subscription Required
By Leeham News Team
Nov 4, 2024, © Leeham News: Airbus sees potential for an up-gauged A220 aircraft, but that would not pose a threat to the future viability of the A320 family, the company’s SVP for commercial aircraft marketing, Joost Van der Heijden, has said.
A220 sales have been somewhat sluggish, with the larger A220-300 variant leading in orders. In the first nine months of 2024 (to the end of September), Airbus secured an order from Air Baltic for 10 -300s, and cancellations from Nordic Aviation Capital for two of the smallest -100 variant and 10 -300s. In 2023, the A220 secured 142 orders across both variants.
Airbus A220-500. Credit: Leeham News.
Seeking to drive demand in the A220 program, Airbus is understood to be considering a stretched A220-500 model once production reaches 14 units per month, and Van der Heijden acknowledged there was “potential for family growth” beyond the current -100 and -300.
The A220-100 is a 110-seat airplane in a typical two-class configuration. The A220-300 seats 135 passengers, and the A220-500 would seat around 157, putting it in direct competition with the A320neo.
Five years to produce 737s at 50/mo, consultancy predicts
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 31, 2024, © Leeham News: When Boeing held its first investors day since 2018 in November 2022, then-CEO David Calhoun projected that the production rate for the 737 would be 50/mo sometime next year, three years hence.
John Schmidt, Accenture. Credit: Accenture.
This rate was slightly below the 52/mo production on March 9, 2019. The next day, an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX 8 crashed on take-off from Addis Ababa. It was the second MAX crash in five months. The two disasters killed 346 people. China grounded more than 80 MAXes operated by its airlines the same day. Europe’s EASA regulator and Transport Canada followed shortly. The Federal Aviation Administration didn’t follow suit until March 13.
Twenty-one months later, the FAA recertified the MAX. Global regulators followed, with China’s CAAC being the last to do so.
In March 2019, Boeing planned on boosting production to 57 a month by the end of the year. Planning was underway to increase production to 63/mo and even into the 70s.
Calhoun’s guidance blew out the window when a door plug blew out of a 737-9 MAX at 16,000 ft on Jan. 5 this year. But for the grace of God, there were no fatalities and only minor injuries. Pilots made a safe emergency landing. The ensuing investigation revealed production and safety lapses. The FAA clamped down on Boeing, officially capping production at 38/mo for now. In reality, new production hovered around 20/mo before the assemblers, the IAM 751 union, went on strike on Sept. 13. There is no end in sight.
Boeing’s new production 737 line has been well below the target of 38/mo all year. Source: Bernstein Research, Oct. 29, 2024.
So, when will Boeing get to a rate of 50/mo? A consulting firm—which occasionally consults with Boeing—predicts it will be another five years. Around November 2029. It’s a stunning prediction.
Job one in Boeing’s employee reset: changing the culture
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 28, 2024, © Leeham News: With last week’s decisive rejection by Boeing’s largest union, the IAM 751, of the third contract offer from the company, the question remains: What now?
Obviously, Boeing and the union must return to the bargaining table. A fourth contract offer must be forthcoming. One reason the union members voted 64%-36% to reject the third offer: no pension plan was included, a do-or-die demand for many members.
Boeing must sweeten its contract offer to the IAM 751–a lot–to settle the strike. Credit: Leeham News.
Boeing won’t give in on this, officials say. So, what now?
John Schmidt. Credit: Accenture.
It’s clear Boeing must sweeten the terms contained in the third contract offer. The 35% pay hike still fell short of labor’s demand for a 40% hike. Boeing also sweetened the bonus and 401(k) retirement plan contributions, and other terms. It’s also pretty clear that Boeing needs to really, really sweeten the offer to persuade the do-or-diers to let go of the pension plan demand.
How much sweetening is needed is anybody’s guess. But eventually some agreement will be reached and passed.
Then the story becomes about recovery.
In an interview with Accenture, a consultancy the works closely with aerospace companies (including Boeing), is optimistic that Boeing’s new CEO can turn things around. John Schmidt, the head of its Global Aerospace and Defense department, explained in an interview last week after the contract vote.
Heart Aerospace’s revised ES-30, Part 3. UPDATED
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
October 24, 2024, © Leeham News: We analyze Heart Aerospace’s latest evolution of the hybrid ES-30. The latest version, presented in spring 2024, is a parallel hybrid, putting gas turbine turboprop engines outside the electric motor engines.
After examining what such a parallel hybrid system means for aircraft dimensions and masses, we now fly the aircraft on a typical US short-haul route through our Aircraft Performance and Cost Model (APCM) to assess its operational performance.
Does the ES-30 make operational sense for an airline that needs a short-haul feeder?
Summary:
- The parallel hybrid architecture gives the ES-30 certain operational flexibility to fly routes over 100nm, making it possible to replace present 30 seaters on such short routes.
- However, the operational costs are considerably higher than today’s 30-seaters. As always, the problem is the battery costs.
- UPDATE: Heart Aerospace contacted us after the article was published. The article has been complemented with their information.
3Q Earnings reports kick off this week
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 21, 2024, © Leeham News: Third quarter earnings reports kick off this week. The most anticipated call will be The Boeing Co.
Boeing previewed a big loss for the quarter on Oct. 11. On Oct. 15, it filed a registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for $25bn in equities, debt, and other securities—money that’s badly needed as it bleeds cash. It also filed another SEC document for a “supplemental” $10bn line of credit. This is in addition to a previous $10bn credit agreement.
Coupled with the $10bn in cash, Boeing potentially has up to $55bn in liquidity.
With the quarter’s loss already pre-announced and the new $25bn liquidity plan filed with the SEC, much of the suspense for Boeing’s earnings call is over. Also on Wednesday, the company’s largest union, the IAM 751 workers, vote on a new contract offer to end a strike closing in on its sixth week. Further color about CEO Kelly Ortberg’s “reset” plan for the company will be closely watched.
Boeing’s earnings call is Wednesday at 10:30 am EDT. The press release will be issued before the stock market opens. The union vote will be announced Wednesday evening.
In addition to Boeing’s earnings call this week, RTX (parent of ailing Pratt & Whitney) and GE Aerospace announce their earnings on Tuesday at 8:30 am EDT and 7:30 am EDT, respectively.
RTX results continue to be dragged down by PW’s continuing technical challenges with the Gear Turbo Fan engines that power the Airbus A220, A320neo and Embraer E-Jet. GE faces a drag on late deliveries and time-on-wing issues with its LEAP engines that power the Boeing 737 MAX and A320neo. GE is also affected by all the production turmoil and IAM strike at Boeing.
Germany’s MTU Aerospace reports on Thursday as well. MTU is a supplier to PW and GE. Safran reports on Friday.
Heart Aerospace’s revised ES-30, Part 2
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
October 17, 2024, © Leeham News: We analyze Heart Aerospace’s latest evolution of the hybrid ES-30 (bottom aircraft in the picture), which replaces the original battery-based 19-seater (top aircraft) and the original ES-30 (mid aircraft).
The latest version, presented in spring 2024, is a parallel hybrid, putting gas turbine turboprop engines outside the electric motors. What are the advantages of the parallel hybrid version, and will it make the Heart ES-30 project more likely to succeed?
We use our Aircraft Performance and Cost Model (APCM) to understand the design choices and the costs involved.
Summary:
- The latest revision of the Heart Aerospace hybrid electric aircraft, the ES-30, takes the hybrid architecture from a serial to a parallel system. It simplifies the architecture.
- Does the revised ES-30 make airline operational sense? We analyze this using our Aircraft Performance and Cost Model.
Boeing: Breaking Up is Hard to Do
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
Oct. 14, 2024, © Leeham News: As newly minted CEO Kelly Ortberg struggles to deal with striking workers from the International Aerospace Machinists (IAM) union in the Seattle and Portland (OR) areas, calls continued for the Boeing Company (BA) to shed one or more of the divisions that make up the corporate entity.
Some point to the turnaround at General Electric, which has now become the standalone GE Aerospace (GE), after a series of divestitures and consolidations into three business units, with two being sold, as a model that Boeing should follow.
While the prospect seems to be rather straightforward, it is far more complex and intertwined than simply throwing up a for sale sign on the front door of an underperforming or unwanted business segment. It might be better to ride out the current storm as a whole and focus efforts on fixing what ails the patient, rather than cutting off a limb.
Boeing strike hits suppliers, Airbus steps in
- Strike creates gap for suppliers.
- Airbus places accelerated orders at some affected suppliers.
- Snapping up capacity may complicate Boeing’s post-strike recovery.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 10, 2024, © Leeham News: There is no end in sight for the strike by the International Association of Machines and Aerospace Workers, District 751, ending its fourth week today.
The strike costs Boeing between $50m and $150m a day, depending on whose estimate you believe. (The world will have an understanding of the cost on Oct. 23, when Boeing reports its third-quarter financial results.)
A strike by the IAM 751 in 2008 lasted 57 days. Boeing lost an estimated $6bn in sales during this period and racked up more than $2bn in lost cash flow. It took Boeing about two years to fully recover from the strike. Then, Boeing didn’t have the overhang that it has today from five years of crises and an irate Federal Aviation Administration that oversees and restricts Boeing’s production.
But recovery, whenever it begins, has a new wrinkle that didn’t exist in 2008. Then, it was Airbus that was in disarray. Its A380 program was in shambles due to production issues. The fledging A350, Airbus’ answer to the Boeing 787, was being redesigned and tweaked for the fourth or fifth time due to poor market reception. The A400M program was an operational and financial disaster.
Today, Airbus is playing from a position of strength and dominance. Boeing is playing from a position of weakness and financial trauma.
Strike slows Boeing’s march toward improving safety culture
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Credit: Federal Aviation Administration.
Oct. 7, 2024, © Leeham News: With the strike at Boeing by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 751 nearing its fourth week, progress in improving the safety culture is one of the areas that has slowed.
Boeing initiated a company-wide furlough to stem cash outflow during the strike. Among those laid off were people in the Chief Aerospace Safety Office, The Seattle Times reported on Sept. 19.
“[O]ne particular set of nonunion employees were surprised to learn they will be among those subject to the rolling furloughs,” the newspaper reported.
“That’s those in Boeing’s Chief Aerospace Safety Office — responsible for the company’s implementation of Congressional legislation that raised safety standards and setting up a new companywide safety management system.”
The Safety Office was created in 2021 in the fallout from the 2018-19 737 MAX crisis and continuing revelations of shortcomings in safety protocols and quality assurances on assembly lines in Washington State and South Carolina. It’s headed by Mike Delaney, a career Boeing employee.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has come down hard on Boeing to improve its safety culture and quality control.
Related Stories
The IAM 751 and Boeing in 2019 proposed a safety reporting program called ASAP, which stands for Aviation Safety Action Program. It took three years of negotiations before it was adopted. Two years later, union president Jon Holden said implementation was still in its early stages.
Boeing’s engineer and technicians union, SPEEA, early this year proposed a similar ASAP program, But in April, the union claimed it and Boeing was at an impasse over how the program would work. Negotiations between SPEEA and the company were held by Boeing’s labor relations department, not the Safety Office.
Boeing’s labor negotiators now have the strike to contend with. With the Safety Office employees subject to rolling furloughs, progress on improving the company’s safety culture has slowed. SPEEA’s lead negotiator is now occupied with contract talks at Spirit AeroSystems, a major Boeing supplier. SPEEA also represents the engineers and technicians there.
Rival Airbus has its safety protocols from which Boeing might benefit as an example to follow.
Aerospace supply chain still ailing; Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to go green
- Aerospace supply chain is still in recovery.
- Suppliers in Russia had to be closed. What happens if the same happens in China?
- Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to green aviation. Innovation in engine and airframe design is.
- US government must step up funding to go green.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 4, 2024, © Leeham News: RTX, maker of the Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbo Fan engine and a large supplier to Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and others through various divisions, continues to struggle with its supply chain.
CEO Greg Hayes told the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit last month that “as much as we had contingency plans for pandemics, and I go back to the early 2000s with SARS and how the airlines managed through that, we were completely unprepared for COVID. Absolutely completely. There was no playbook.
“How do you keep your employees safe? How do you keep the airlines flying, despite the fact that there were very few passengers? How do you maintain all of your systems?”