Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- Engine makers tout “Plan A” but have “Plan B” backups in R&D June 23, 2025
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 27. June 20, 2025
- Pontifications: A Personal Note June 19, 2025
- Airbus books 142 firm orders as Boeing retracts from the Paris Air Show June 19, 2025
- AIN Media Group Agrees to Acquire Leeham News & Analysis June 17, 2025
Where and who will be laid off in Boeing reset?
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 14, 2024, © Leeham News: As Boeing prepares to lay off about 10% of its workforce of 170,000 employees, the key question remains unanswered:
Who and where will the layoffs come from?
Boeing didn’t say in its Friday announcement, other than in broad terms: “These reductions will include executives, managers, and employees,” CEO Kelly Ortberg said in a message to employees.
“Executives” in the Boeing organization include down to the Director level in management—not just the C or officer level. Union and non-union employees are at risk.
But there was no information about which divisions will be subject to layoffs, or how many in each.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes has the most employees of the three divisions of the company. But the “Enterprise” by far employs more than BCA or the other two units. Figure 1 has the breakdown.
Pontifications: Boeing needs massive reset, and not just with labor
Subscription Required
Now open to all readers.
- CEO Kelly Ortberg’s “reset” plan is long overdue. But Boeing needs to do better for the IAM members, and the members need to give up on the defined pension plan.
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 14, 2024, © Leeham News: The Friday afternoon announcements by Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg of a 10% employee reduction, termination of the 767 commercial airliner in 2027, and recognition that commercial and defense programs need drastic surgery is long overdue.
When Ortberg became CEO on Aug. 8, he said one of his top priorities was to “reset” relationships with labor. So far, this hasn’t worked out. But it’s the entire company that needs a reset. And this has been a long, long time coming. I’ll detail this below. But first, let’s talk about the contract talks between the company and the largest union, the IAM 751.
Members, 33,000 of them, walked out on Sept. 13 at 12:01 am. Production of all commercial airliners except the 787 ceased. Production of the commercially-based P-8 and KC-46A also came to a halt, as have all deliveries from Washington State.
Negotiations broke off entirely last week and Boeing withdrew its Best and Final Offer (BAFO). Both sides blamed the other, and competing Unfair Labor Practices complaints have been filed with the National Labor Relations Board. (NLRB).
One of the key areas of dispute: the size of the wage increase. But other factors, such as health care, go into total compensation. Boeing’s total compensation not only lagged others in aerospace, it’s had negative growth since 2018.
Read more
How Boeing’s actions affect Products, Airbus: Analysis (Update)
Updated Oct. 12 with new and clarifying information.
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 11, 2024, © Leeham News: Boeing’s late announcement today of a 10% company-wide layoff of its 170,000 leaves a lot of questions.
Boeing managers were told to expect guidance on Monday. As of Saturday, there is no information available about where the layoffs will occur–how many will be from Boeing Commercial Airplanes, for example, vs Boeing’s Defense and Services units.
Boeing’s announcement did not define “executives;” LNA understands that in the company’s organization, “executives” extend down to the Director management level.
Beyond the immediate, announced moves and impacts to Boeing (see Related Article), terminating the 767-300ERF program in 2027 when current orders are filled will hurt the US Air Force KC-46A aerial refueling tanker cost basis. The commercial program absorbed some of the tanker’s program costs. This was one reason cited by FedEx’s founder Fred Smith to support extending production beyond 2027 when new international emissions regulations render the civilian version ineligible to continue.
Pushing entry-into-service of the 777-9 to 2026 and the 777-8F into 2028 should benefit Airbus with sales of the A350. Its largest passenger version, the -1000 model, is smaller than the 777-9 by nominally 60 passengers. But some airlines consider the -9 too big anyway. Airbus has few near-term production slots available for the A350, so any delay for the 777-9 benefits Airbus.
The same holds true for the 777-8F. Airbus offers a freighter version of the A350 and further delays of the 777-8F should benefit Airbus.
Airbus has a goal to produce 10 A350s a month in 2026. The line is essentially sold out then and slightly oversold in 2027. But the wing factor in Wales has a capacity of 12-13 shipsets a month; it’s unclear what the current capacity of the A350 final assembly line in Toulouse is. The pacing item remains with the supply chain capacity.
Related Story
Boeing Announces Preliminary Significant Q3 Loss: Cuts 767 Freighter Program, Delays 777X EIS, Major Layoffs
By Chris Sloan
October 11, 2024, ©. Leeham News – In a late Friday news dump just after U.S. financial markets closed, The Boeing Company Announced significant financial hits as the IAM strike lurches toward a full month with no end in sight, nor are further talks scheduled after pulling its latest off the table.
In an email to Boeing staff, Kelly Ortberg, Boeing President and Chief executive Officer, starkly admitted: “Our business is in a difficult position, and it is hard to overstate the challenges we face together. Beyond navigating our current environment, restoring our company requires tough decisions and we will have to make structural changes to ensure we can stay competitive and deliver for our customers over the long term.”
The company announced a multi-prong series of “clear-eyed, difficult decisions” and program updates. The headline is a roughly 10% permanent reduction in the size of the non-represented workforce, many of whom are already on furlough or partial furlough. These reductions will include executives, managers, and employees, who will begin learning their fate next week. The company did say, it will not proceed with the second wave of furloughs for now.
- Boeing reports preliminary third quarter results
- Boeing CEO Message About Positioning for the Future
Bjorn’s Corner: New engine development. Part 28. Wrapup.
By Bjorn Fehrm
October 11, 2024, ©. Leeham News: We have done an article series on why engine development takes longer than airframe development. Part of the reason is that advancements in engine technology can deliver considerably higher fuel consumption reductions than airframe advancements.
The change of engines for the A320 series and 737 MAX delivered a 15% improvement in engine efficiency. In contrast, the airframe improvement was less than half, mainly by stacking cabin seats closer together.
Figure 1. The 4:1 gear ratio Utrafan demonstrator in the Rolls-Royce test cell. Source: Rolls-Royce.
Boeing strike hits suppliers, Airbus steps in
- Strike creates gap for suppliers.
- Airbus places accelerated orders at some affected suppliers.
- Snapping up capacity may complicate Boeing’s post-strike recovery.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 10, 2024, © Leeham News: There is no end in sight for the strike by the International Association of Machines and Aerospace Workers, District 751, ending its fourth week today.
The strike costs Boeing between $50m and $150m a day, depending on whose estimate you believe. (The world will have an understanding of the cost on Oct. 23, when Boeing reports its third-quarter financial results.)
A strike by the IAM 751 in 2008 lasted 57 days. Boeing lost an estimated $6bn in sales during this period and racked up more than $2bn in lost cash flow. It took Boeing about two years to fully recover from the strike. Then, Boeing didn’t have the overhang that it has today from five years of crises and an irate Federal Aviation Administration that oversees and restricts Boeing’s production.
But recovery, whenever it begins, has a new wrinkle that didn’t exist in 2008. Then, it was Airbus that was in disarray. Its A380 program was in shambles due to production issues. The fledging A350, Airbus’ answer to the Boeing 787, was being redesigned and tweaked for the fourth or fifth time due to poor market reception. The A400M program was an operational and financial disaster.
Today, Airbus is playing from a position of strength and dominance. Boeing is playing from a position of weakness and financial trauma.
Boeing-IAM contract talks fail, no new negotiations scheduled, no end in sight
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 9, 2024, (c) Leeham News: Contract talks between Boeing and its largest union, the IAM 751, broke off again yesterday after the two sides failed to make progress to reach an agreement.
The strike is four weeks old tomorrow. No new talks are scheduled and there is no end in sight to the strike.
The two sides issued public statements yesterday that make it seem they weren’t even at the same meeting.
Click on image to enlarge. Credit: Boeing, IAM 751.
Boeing 3Q deliveries up despite strike
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 8, 2024, © Leeham News: Third quarter deliveries by Boeing were up slightly despite a strike the last two weeks of the quarter by its machinists union.
Boeing deliveries 92 737s during the quarter, despite lower new-production rates hovering around +/- 20/mo. The company doesn’t break out deliveries from the lingering inventory of 737s vs new production aircraft. Deliveries of the 787 also are a mix of new-production airplanes and those from inventory that required rework from a production flaw discovered in 2020.
Boeing said deliveries included “new-build production units, including remanufactures and modifications.”
Strike slows Boeing’s march toward improving safety culture
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Credit: Federal Aviation Administration.
Oct. 7, 2024, © Leeham News: With the strike at Boeing by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 751 nearing its fourth week, progress in improving the safety culture is one of the areas that has slowed.
Boeing initiated a company-wide furlough to stem cash outflow during the strike. Among those laid off were people in the Chief Aerospace Safety Office, The Seattle Times reported on Sept. 19.
“[O]ne particular set of nonunion employees were surprised to learn they will be among those subject to the rolling furloughs,” the newspaper reported.
“That’s those in Boeing’s Chief Aerospace Safety Office — responsible for the company’s implementation of Congressional legislation that raised safety standards and setting up a new companywide safety management system.”
The Safety Office was created in 2021 in the fallout from the 2018-19 737 MAX crisis and continuing revelations of shortcomings in safety protocols and quality assurances on assembly lines in Washington State and South Carolina. It’s headed by Mike Delaney, a career Boeing employee.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has come down hard on Boeing to improve its safety culture and quality control.
Related Stories
The IAM 751 and Boeing in 2019 proposed a safety reporting program called ASAP, which stands for Aviation Safety Action Program. It took three years of negotiations before it was adopted. Two years later, union president Jon Holden said implementation was still in its early stages.
Boeing’s engineer and technicians union, SPEEA, early this year proposed a similar ASAP program, But in April, the union claimed it and Boeing was at an impasse over how the program would work. Negotiations between SPEEA and the company were held by Boeing’s labor relations department, not the Safety Office.
Boeing’s labor negotiators now have the strike to contend with. With the Safety Office employees subject to rolling furloughs, progress on improving the company’s safety culture has slowed. SPEEA’s lead negotiator is now occupied with contract talks at Spirit AeroSystems, a major Boeing supplier. SPEEA also represents the engineers and technicians there.
Rival Airbus has its safety protocols from which Boeing might benefit as an example to follow.
Aerospace supply chain still ailing; Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to go green
- Aerospace supply chain is still in recovery.
- Suppliers in Russia had to be closed. What happens if the same happens in China?
- Sustainable Aviation Fuel isn’t the answer to green aviation. Innovation in engine and airframe design is.
- US government must step up funding to go green.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 4, 2024, © Leeham News: RTX, maker of the Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbo Fan engine and a large supplier to Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and others through various divisions, continues to struggle with its supply chain.
CEO Greg Hayes told the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit last month that “as much as we had contingency plans for pandemics, and I go back to the early 2000s with SARS and how the airlines managed through that, we were completely unprepared for COVID. Absolutely completely. There was no playbook.
“How do you keep your employees safe? How do you keep the airlines flying, despite the fact that there were very few passengers? How do you maintain all of your systems?”