Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 21. May 9, 2025
- Does an A220-500 need a new wing and engines? Part 2. May 8, 2025
- Embraer downplays tariff impact on 2025 results May 6, 2025
- JetZero readies effort for private equity fund raising May 5, 2025
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 20. May 2, 2025
How good is the COMAC C919?
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
March 20, 2025, © Leeham News: The COMAC C919 is finding its first customers outside China, with an order from the Brunei-based GallopAir upstart being first with an order for 30 C919 in September 2023. These aircraft cannot be delivered until the Brunei regulator has approved the C919 Chinese certification, which was issued by the Chinese regulator in September 2022.
Deliveries to Chinese airliners began in December 2022, with 2023 mostly spent on route proving with China Eastern Airlines first delivered aircraft. China Eastern took delivery of a further two C919s during 2023. COMAC delivered 13 C919s in 2024 to China Eastern Airlines (8), Air China (2), and China Southern Airlines (3).
The second Air China C919 was the first C919ER version, featuring a 3,000nm nominal range, whereas the others were the standard 2,200nm version.
With deliveries now at around one aircraft per month and the start of marketing to airlines outside China, it’s time to examine the C919 more closely and compare it to the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX.
Figure 1. The first C919 delivered to China Eastern Airlines in December 2022. Source: COMAC.
Summary:
- The C919 has now reached series delivery, with 13 aircraft delivered during 2024.
- The first sales campaigns outside China have started.
- How significant a threat will the C919 pose to Airbus and Boeing?
Boeing and Airbus: A financial comparison
Subscription Required
By Karl Sinclair
March 3, 2025, © Leeham News: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,” famously wrote Charles Dickens in the opening of A Tale of Two Cities.
Boeing 737 MAX. Credit: Boeing.
Indeed, the financial results may indicate that neither Airbus (AB) nor Boeing (BA) are going through the best of times. However, one corporation clearly weathered 2024 better than the other.
While Airbus (with Helicopters, and Defense and Space) and Boeing (with Defense and Space, and Global Services) have other business segments, make no mistake: these are the undercards that make up the heavyweight title fight.
Airbus and Boeing will both go as their respective commercial aircraft divisions do.
Airbus A320neo. Credit: Airbus.
Both OEMs have released 20-year commercial aircraft market projections, forecasting that more than 40,000 new aircraft are needed, worth trillions of euros and dollars. This is the huge prize Airbus and Boeing are grappling with.
Summary
- About 10 years for Boeing’s financial recovery.
- Boeing could deliver its entire backlog, and its debt will still be greater than pre-crisis levels.
- A400M continues to be a drag on Airbus financials.
- Spirit AeroSystems will add to Boeing’s debt.
GE sees 2,500 LEAP engine deliveries by 2028, enough for more than 1,000 A320neos and 737 MAXes
Larry Culp, CEO of GE Aerospace. Credit: GE Aerospace.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Feb. 24, 2025, © Leeham News: CFM International plans to deliver 2,500 LEAP engines by 2028, enough to power more than 1,000 Airbus A320neos and Boeing 737 MAXes plus spare engines in a single year.
CFM is the 50-50 joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran. The 737 exclusively uses the LEAP. The A320neo family splits its powerplant business between CFM and Pratt & Whitney’s Geared Turbo Fan engines. Between the MAX and a portion of the A320neo engines, CFM has a solid majority of the market share for the mainline single-aisle aircraft sector.
CFM is the brand for the CFM56 and LEAP, but GE and Safran benefit from the aftermarket business. Between the two engines, the maintenance, repair, and overhaul business is big and profitable.
Larry Culp, CEO of GE Aerospace, spoke at the Barclays investors conference on Feb. 20.
“There’s no question that from an aftermarket perspective, LEAP on top of CFM56 is going to keep us very busy,” Culp said. “We haven’t been particularly good at calling the outlook here because we’ve undershot the reality with the CFM56 the last couple of years.”
Culp said that GE continues to believe that it’s got several years of growth ahead. “We probably don’t see an apex until probably the 2027, 28-ish time period, and then we’ll see a gradual fade with the CFM56.
“I think we’re still talking about 2,000 shop visits at the end of the decade. We’ll see if we’re right or wrong on that, but that’s our current view. I think our partners at Safran have in effect echoed that recently at their own earnings call.”
Airbus 2024 results: “A decent year in a challenging environment”.
By Bjorn Fehrm
February 20, 2025, © Leeham News in Toulouse: The headline uses the words of Airbus CEO Guillame Faury when he opened the presentation of Airbus 2024 results in Toulouse today. It was a session where Faury and the CFO Thomas Toepfer put in an effort to let all present international journalists and their online colleagues ask all questions and deliver honest answers.
On the business-as-usual side, the company delivered 766 aircraft, which was within the guidance, after a deep grab effort in 4Q, leading to low deliveries for 1Q2025. EBIT at €5.4bn and Free Cash Flow at €4.5bn were also within guidance.
In general, the Commercial airplane side was fighting specific supply problems during 2024, which might limit the ramp-up of A350s and A220s going forward, more of which below. Helicopters have now recovered from challenging times and delivered a solid result. Defense and Space are strong in Air Power (fighters, etc.), given the tense European situation, with Space going through restructuring, which might include mergers with other European space players.
The real news was the reasons for pausing the CityAirbus eVTOL program, according to Faury, “not only because batteries were not where they should have been but also due to the lack of a market for this type of transportation.” As the world’s largest supplier of helicopters, Airbus is a credible source for such a lack of market statement.
Faury also detailed what is happening on the Hydrogen side. Due to slower-than-expected progress in Green Hydrogen production build-up, deployment of preparatory Ground Support Equipment (GSE), and Transportation using hydrogen at the airports in their H2 partner network, Airbus has decided to push out the entry into service of a “commercially viable hydrogen aircraft” by five to ten years.
However, said Faury, it has made progress. “We have reached TRL 3 for the tecnobricks, which has enabled us to select the Fuel Cell path as the preferred way forward. This means these activities are continued at the present level or even intensified, but it also means other paths (read Hydrogen burn) are ramped down. Overall, it means a decrease in R&D spending for Hydrogen activities in the coming years.”
Read more
Tier 1 suppliers are a “failed market”
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Feb. 20, 2025, © Leeham News: The Tier 1 supply chain is all but dead.
Kevin Michaels.
This rather startling conclusion belongs to Kevin Michaels, the managing director of the consulting firm Aerodynamic Advisory. When he explains his thinking, it supports a major shift in the aerospace industry.
He made his remarks at the Pacific Northwest Aerospace Alliance conference this month in the Seattle area.
Tier 1 supplies are the last step in the supply chain, delivering products directly to the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), such as Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and the engine makers.
Michaels said the supply chain is “fragile” and “red hot.” “Overall, the supply chain is in better shape than it was last year at this time. It’s in better shape now than it was two years ago. But it’s still incredibly fragile.” OEMs purchase about 75% of the value of the aircraft from the supply chain. Aerostructures are the first tier. And this is where Michaels’ rubber hits the road.
Another One Bites the Dust; alternative energy gives way to realities
Grounded: Eviation’s Alice, a concept that had more questions than answers. Credit: Eviation.
By Scott Hamilton
Feb. 18, 2025, © Leeham News: Universal Hydrogen. Lilium. Volocopter. Tecnam’s electric airplane. Airbus electric. Airbus hydrogen. ATR hybrid.
Eviation was just the latest alternative energy project to bite the dust.
And these are just the ones we’ve heard about.
Boeing declined comment on the status of its WISK autonomous electric air taxi. Its future may have as much to do with the company’s current financial condition and efforts to recover from a series of crises since the March 2019 grounding of the 737 MAX than with technology or business model concerns.
The alternative energy aviation industry, the soup du jour in recent years, is running out of gas, so-to-speak. LNA’s aerospace engineer, Bjorn Fehrm, predicted years ago that battery-, and hybrid-powered airplanes were concepts that wouldn’t fly and that hydrogen’s availability at airports is tough nut to crack.
The International Air Transport Association in October 2021 adopted a goal for the airline industry to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Aggressive milestones also were adopted. Included were ambitious goals to significantly increase the use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), the path favored by Boeing.
Tim Clark, the president of Emirates Airline, said then, Don’t make promises you can’t keep.
The industry, it now increasingly admits, can’t keep these promises.
Spirit Aero teeters on bankruptcy, but what’s new about that?
By Karl Sinclair
Feb. 10, 2025, © Leeham News: Spirit Aerosystems (SPR) of Wichita (KS) filed an 8-K report with the Securities and Exchange Commission today with a troubling statement in its Investor Presentation:
“Due to Spirit’s cash flow and liquidity position, management expects to make a going concern disclosure in its 2024 Form 10-K. The Company anticipates that it will conclude in its 2024 From 10-K that there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.”
Going concern is an accounting term indicating that a corporation has serious doubts about its ability to continue operations for the next year.
Given Spirit’s important position as a Tier 1 supplier for Airbus and Boeing, this is a troubling development for both OEMs. But it’s not unexpected. Airbus and Boeing have been propping up Spirit for years with hundreds of millions of dollars in advance payments or loans. Without them, Spirit probably would have filed for bankruptcy long before now.
Trump vows to add tariffs to aluminum and steel; Airbus, Boeing, suppliers will be impacted
By Scott Hamilton
Feb. 10, 2025, © Leeham News: President Donald Trump announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on imported aluminum and steel this week, including from the USA’s largest supplying countries: Canada and Mexico.
According to Trump’s weekend announcement, China will be tagged with a 10% tariff. Other countries also export these products to the USA, but Trump didn’t mention any.
In the aerospace industry, Boeing and Airbus will be affected. So will suppliers to the two companies.
Boeing sees achieving pre-MAX grounding production rates 8 years later
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Jan. 30, 2025, © Leeham News: When Airbus began to record more orders than Boeing in the early 2000 decade, Boeing’s CEO dismissed the shift.
Orders didn’t matter, sniffed Phil Condit. Only deliveries mattered. The statement ignored the obvious: if you didn’t have orders, you wouldn’t have deliveries.
For much of the past two decades, Airbus has been delivering more airplanes than Boeing. According to both companies’ forecasts, this trend will continue in the heart of the market in the coming years by a wide margin.
Deliveries of the 737 MAX are key to Boeing’s financial recovery. The cash flow and profits from the MAX line will drive Boeing’s ability to develop a new airplane. (This does not ignore the necessity of Boeing’s defense unit to get its financial house in order.)
Kelly Ortberg, Boeing’s CEO, appeared on the financial news network CNBC this week and said Boeing hopes to return to a production rate of 38/mo in the second half of this year.
“I’m not going put a date on when we need to get to rate 38 and get approval for the FAA to go beyond,” he said. “It’s more important that we do this right; we have a stable production system, we get through that, and I expect by the second half of the year, we’ll have that approval, and we’ll be moving to a higher production rate.”
Rate breaks in 5 every six months
Ortberg added, “Well, we’re planning to be at about 38 a month for the balance of this year, ramping up, and we’ll go in five-step increments every six months after that. On 787, we’re at five a month rate, moving to seven a month rate…hopefully, that’s in the next quarter or so.”
The 737 data can be extrapolated to suggest Boeing will return to the pre-MAX grounding rate (52/mo) in the first half of 2027. (Others are skeptical, and the ramp-up appears aggressive.) This would be eight years after the MAX was grounded on March 10-13, 2019, for what turned out to be 21 months.
Boeing was on its way to a rate of 57/mo by the end of 2019. Under the Boeing plan, this rate won’t be achieved until the end of 2027. If Boeing still believes demand supports this rate, a higher rate of 63/mo that was planned pre-grounding would follow in 2028.
Airbus will also increase its production rate. Production and delivery forecasts appear to place Boeing at a permanent distant second to Airbus as long as the competitors are the A320neo and 737 MAX.
777 P2F market grinds to a halt: lack of feedstock, Boeing, war, money to blame
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Jan. 27, 2025, (c) Leeham News: Boeing’s inability to deliver 787s on time and continued delays in certification of the 777-9 mean airlines planning to replace aging aircraft or expand must retain older aircraft longer than expected.
Airbus’ inability to deliver the A350 on planned schedules also affects fleet renewal and expansion plans, but to a much lesser extent than caused by Boeing.
IAI’s Big Twin Boeing 777-300ERF. Credit: IAI.
Boeing’s circumstances also mean that feedstock intended for conversions of 777-300ERs from passenger aircraft to freighters upset the business models of the three P2F conversion companies: IAI Bedek, KMC, and Mammoth Freighters.
Finally, certification of IAI’s conversation program is running two years behind schedule, and Boeing’s reluctance to license critical flight control software has also stalled P2F programs.
In addition to the problems outlined above, the inability to convert the big twin 777-300ER to freighters or receive new 777-8Fs and A350Fs in the coming years means that 747-400 freighters, which are gas-guzzlers by today’s standards and expensive to maintain, must remain in service longer than planned.
It’s a bleak picture emerging for the near- to-mid-term freighter market.