By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 9, 2024, (c) Leeham News: Contract talks between Boeing and its largest union, the IAM 751, broke off again yesterday after the two sides failed to make progress to reach an agreement.
The strike is four weeks old tomorrow. No new talks are scheduled and there is no end in sight to the strike.
The two sides issued public statements yesterday that make it seem they weren’t even at the same meeting.
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 8, 2024, © Leeham News: Third quarter deliveries by Boeing were up slightly despite a strike the last two weeks of the quarter by its machinists union.
Boeing deliveries 92 737s during the quarter, despite lower new-production rates hovering around +/- 20/mo. The company doesn’t break out deliveries from the lingering inventory of 737s vs new production aircraft. Deliveries of the 787 also are a mix of new-production airplanes and those from inventory that required rework from a production flaw discovered in 2020.
Boeing said deliveries included “new-build production units, including remanufactures and modifications.”
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 7, 2024, © Leeham News: With the strike at Boeing by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 751 nearing its fourth week, progress in improving the safety culture is one of the areas that has slowed.
Boeing initiated a company-wide furlough to stem cash outflow during the strike. Among those laid off were people in the Chief Aerospace Safety Office, The Seattle Times reported on Sept. 19.
“[O]ne particular set of nonunion employees were surprised to learn they will be among those subject to the rolling furloughs,” the newspaper reported.
“That’s those in Boeing’s Chief Aerospace Safety Office — responsible for the company’s implementation of Congressional legislation that raised safety standards and setting up a new companywide safety management system.”
The Safety Office was created in 2021 in the fallout from the 2018-19 737 MAX crisis and continuing revelations of shortcomings in safety protocols and quality assurances on assembly lines in Washington State and South Carolina. It’s headed by Mike Delaney, a career Boeing employee.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has come down hard on Boeing to improve its safety culture and quality control.
The IAM 751 and Boeing in 2019 proposed a safety reporting program called ASAP, which stands for Aviation Safety Action Program. It took three years of negotiations before it was adopted. Two years later, union president Jon Holden said implementation was still in its early stages.
Boeing’s engineer and technicians union, SPEEA, early this year proposed a similar ASAP program, But in April, the union claimed it and Boeing was at an impasse over how the program would work. Negotiations between SPEEA and the company were held by Boeing’s labor relations department, not the Safety Office.
Boeing’s labor negotiators now have the strike to contend with. With the Safety Office employees subject to rolling furloughs, progress on improving the company’s safety culture has slowed. SPEEA’s lead negotiator is now occupied with contract talks at Spirit AeroSystems, a major Boeing supplier. SPEEA also represents the engineers and technicians there.
Rival Airbus has its safety protocols from which Boeing might benefit as an example to follow.
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 4, 2024, © Leeham News: RTX, maker of the Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbo Fan engine and a large supplier to Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and others through various divisions, continues to struggle with its supply chain.
CEO Greg Hayes told the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit last month that “as much as we had contingency plans for pandemics, and I go back to the early 2000s with SARS and how the airlines managed through that, we were completely unprepared for COVID. Absolutely completely. There was no playbook.
“How do you keep your employees safe? How do you keep the airlines flying, despite the fact that there were very few passengers? How do you maintain all of your systems?”
October 4, 2024, ©. Leeham News: We do an article series about engine development and why it has longer timelines than airframe development. It also carries larger risks of product maturity problems when it enters service than the airframe of an airliner.
We looked at engine technologies and why several are challenging to bring to a mature technical state. Then, we compared previous engine developments with the present generation. Memory is short. What we could see is that previous generations of engines carried larger reliability and durability problems than the present generation engines.
Now, we discuss the development timelines for key engine versus airframe developments.
Update, Oct. 3: The Longshoreman’s union and the employers agreed to a 62% pay hike over six years. The strike has been called off.
By Scott Hamilton
Oct. 1, 2024, © Leeham News: As if the aviation industry supply chain isn’t causing enough heartburn to Airbus and Boeing, a new US dockworkers strike today will interrupt shipping to Charleston (SC) and Mobile (AL).
Charleston is where Boeing assembles the 787. Mobile is where Airbus assembles the A320/321. It’s also where there is an assembly line for the A220.
“We are aware of the situation and have taken actions to mitigate the potential impact on our operations in Mobile,” an Airbus spokeswoman said, without providing details. Fuselage sections and wings for the A320s are shipped to Mobile. It’s unclear whether any sub-systems for the A220 are affected; most components are trucked in, but not all.
Boeing’s 787 line largely relies on airlifted components via Boeing’s in-house Dreamlifter program. But some components are shipped. The 787 line currently is the only assembly facility remaining open during a separate contract dispute strike by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. This strike, now in its third week, shut down all Boeing aircraft assembly in the greater Seattle area. Boeing doesn’t “currently” expect and impact.
Subscription Required
Now open to all readers.
By Chris Sloan
Sept. 30, 2024, © Leeham News: Southwest Airlines outlined significant moves in its quest to return to sustained profitability at its investor day on September 26 in Dallas. Widely reported revenue and financial initiatives include assigned and premium seating, network realignment, capacity growth cuts, and staffing reductions.
Billed as Southwest Even Better, the plan is the most transformational program in the company’s 53-year history, according to Chief Executive Officer Bob Jordan. “The plan includes a robust set of tactical and strategic initiatives and elements uniquely available only to Southwest Airlines. The plan is capital efficient and supports achieving our financial goal of ROIC [Return on Invested Capital], well above our cost of capital,” he said. Yet, he acknowledged that recent financial performance is not up to anyone’s expectations. “Our model is not broken, but it needs continued calibration and enhancement.” By 2027, the plan is expected to add approximately $4 bn in cumulative incremental earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT).
Jordan pointed to external factors as a significant culprit, notably Boeing. “It’s no secret that Boeing’s delivery delays have created significant issues for us, making it very difficult for us to run a business. Boeing has delivered very few MAX aircraft on time, and we are still waiting on the MAX 7 certification.” Though compensation agreements remain confidential, “Past financial issues caused by Boeing delivery delays and other Boeing issues have largely been resolved through the application of credits on future deliveries,” said Jordan.
Southwest is taking dramatic steps to mitigate “operational risk” by reducing hiring and cutting annual capacity growth to 1-2 percent through 2027. “We expect production issues at Boeing and issues related to the (Pratt & Whitney) Geared Turbofan engine to continue to constrain industry growth for years to come,” Jordan noted.
September 27, 2024, ©. Leeham News: We do an article series about engine development and why it has longer timelines than airframe development. It also carries larger risks of product maturity problems when it enters service than the airframe of an airliner.
In our look at examples of recent developments with problems and these put in a historical perspective, looking at the reliability and durability of its predecessor we compare the Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 for the Boeing 787 to the Trent XWB for the Airbus A350.
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
September 26, 2024, © Leeham News: Heart Aerospace has revised its environmentally friendly aircraft for the third time. The variants started in September 2020, when Heart presented an all-electric, battery-based 19-seat airliner that should test fly by now and be available in 2026, Figure 1, top aircraft.
Two years later, in September 2022, it all changed. The aircraft was changed to a 30-seater with a serial hybrid propulsion system using turboextenders to increase the operational range, Figure 1, aircraft two.
After another 20 months, the configuration changed again to the third iteration in Figure 1, which will fly in prototype in 2026 and be available to airlines in 2029.
In an article series, we explain the reasons for these changes and analyze whether the changes in the aircraft have increased the likelihood of the ES-30 entering the market in 2029.
Figure 1. The Heart Aerospace regional airliner series. Top, the ES-19, then the ES-30, and finally, the revised ES-30. Source: Heart Aerospace.
By Scott Hamilton
Analysis
Sept. 24, 2024, © Leeham News: That was a short honeymoon.
The desire of Kelly Ortberg, the new CEO of The Boeing Co., to reset labor relations with its largest union came to a crashing halt yesterday. This is a mere six weeks after his appointment, on Aug. 8, to succeed David Calhoun, whose four and two-thirds-year tenure was marked with one failure after another.
Boeing’s largest union, the IAM 751 with 33,000 members, delivered a thumping to the company on Sept. 12 when 95% of the members rejected what Boeing claimed was its best contract offer ever. Ninety-six percent of the members concurrently voted to strike at midnight. They were walking the picket lines when Boeing issued its Best and Final Offer (BAFO) on Sept. 23. The offer sweetened the pot in some key areas.
But how the offer came about and was delivered incensed union members, who rejected the original offer in large part due to 16 years of pent-up anger and resentment over stagnating wages, reduced benefits, and elimination of a defined benefit pension plan. The union concessions were made under threats of locating the final assembly of the 737 MAX and 777X outside the greater Seattle area.
In preparing and presenting the BAFO, Boeing ignored the IAM’s negotiating team. Two days of talks under federal mediation failed. The IAM complained that Boeing refused to return to the negotiating table. (On Sept. 13, the day after the original contract was rejected and the strike began, company CFO Brian West said Boeing was anxious to resume negotiations.)
Boeing released details of the BAFO to the media before presenting it to 751 President Jon Holden. The union later released a scathing statement rejecting the offer and Boeing’s demand for a member vote by midnight Friday, Sept. 27.