Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
What’s the status of the alternative propulsion projects for air transport?
Subscription required
By Bjorn Fehrm
November 13, 2025, © Leeham News: The interest for new and more environmentally friendly aircraft got underway in 2014, when Airbus flew the battery-electric E-fan demonstrator at the Farnborough Air Show in July, Figure 1.
The car revolution to battery-electric cars had taken off two years earlier, when Tesla introduced the Model S sedan with elegant styling and very good performance and economy for a family car (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The battery-electric aircraft demonstrator and the car that started it all. Credit: Airbus and Tesla Inc.
Tesla cars had proven that electric cars could match and even outpace combustion-engine cars in performance and operational costs, though not in driving range. But range was a matter of battery capacity development, and hopes were high for a similar situation and development for aircraft.
As is the case with almost every technological leap, the progression of alternative propulsion aircraft projects followed the Gartner Technology Hype curve (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The Gartner Hype Curve for alternative propulsion aircraft. Credit: Gartner and Leeham Co.
The start was around 2015, passing the Peak of Inflated Expectations around 2020. In the 11 years since 2014, we’ve had hundreds of entrepreneur-driven projects declare they will make environmentally friendly aircraft and airliners a reality.
Nothing useful has come out of these projects, so today, we are passing the Trough of Disillusionment. Investors have stopped funding alternative propulsion startups as these have not produced useful air transport. The result is a mass death of projects, most silently, some more openly.
The core of the remaining projects are run by experienced teams with solid aeronautical knowledge. These are now passing into the Slope of Enlightenment and will make real progress. Given that we are now entering a more productive phase, we take stock of these developments and their programs.
To help the analysis, we use our Aircraft Performance and Cost Model, APCM, to show what the challenges are and how alternative propulsion can address these challenges.
What’s the next new aircraft, Part 5
By Scott Hamilton and Bjorn Fehrm
July 31, 2025, © Leeham News: We wrap up our five-part series today on What’s the Next New Airplane in the coming decades. We now look at Airplanes 9-13 in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. The 13 airliners we look at in the series. Source: Leeham Co.
These are the (9) COMAC 929, (10) Eco-version of New Light Twin, (11) CFM Open Fan single aisle, (12) the Boeing 787 re-engine, and (13) the Airbus A350 re-engine.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 32. Epilogue.
By Bjorn Fehrm
July 25, 2025, ©. Leeham News: In October last year, we began a series on how air transport is performing against the emission goals for the year 2050.
The ambition to reduce and eventually eliminate greenhouse gas emissions began in earnest 11 years ago, when Airbus flew the Airbus E-Fan at the 2014 Farnborough Air Show (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The Airbus E-fan flying at the 2014 Farnborough Air Show. Source: Wikipedia.
The result of this inspiring flight, which utilized technology that emitted no CO2 or other greenhouse gases (if the batteries were charged with green electricity), was an avalanche of projects from established players as well as upstarts. The optimistic view was that there was a solution to the emissions from airliners.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 31, Conclusions.
By Bjorn Fehrm
July 18, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We have done a Corner series on the state of actions to mitigate the global warming impact from Air Transport. Now, we start to summarize what we’ve learned.
During the series, we compiled tables describing the warming effect of air transport in 2024 and a calculation of the effect during 2050. We made two tables, one with the most probable effects, Figure 1, and one where we downplayed the non-CO2 effects to the maximum given in the Lee et al. 2021 study, to a 5% probability, Figure 2.
Figure 1. The effects of Actions 1 to 4 on CO2 and NOx, represented as CO2e emissions during 2050. Source: Leeham Co. Click to enlarge.
Before we summarize by examining the tables, we will discuss the additive effects of CO2 and non-CO2 warming over a given time period, as the different components don’t have the same decay time of their warming effects.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 30.
By Bjorn Fehrm
July 11, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We feature a Corner series on the state of actions to mitigate the global warming impact from Air Transport. We try to understand why different developments have been slow.
In the last Corner, we correlated the growth of airliners between 2024 and 2050 and the growth in Greenhouse gas emissions of CO2 and NOx that would result. We also calculated the increase in warming from contrails based on the traffic increase by 2050. The results are in Figure 1.
We also discussed that the warming effects of CO2 are undisputed, whereas the impact of NOx and contrails is less mature in its complicated effects research. The performed research has a lowest and a highest warming probability. We will now do an “acid test” and see what their impact is when we apply their lowest probable effect on global warming.
Figure 1. The effects of Actions 1 to 4 on CO2 and NOx, represented as CO2e emissions by 2050. Source: Leeham Co. Click to enlarge.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 29.
By Bjorn Fehrm
July 4, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We feature a Corner series on the state of actions to mitigate the global warming impact from Air Transport. We try to understand why different developments have been slow.
In the last Corner, we wanted to understand the relationship between Greenhouse gas emissions of CO2 and NOx and the effect of global warming from contrails. After some iterations, we arrived at the comparison shown in Figure 1, where we compare different warming effects using CO2 and CO2e (CO2 equivalents, i.e. the same warming effect as CO2).
Figure 1. The Global waring effect of CO2, NOx and warming contrails by 2050 as CO2 and CO2e. Source: Leeham Co. Click to enlarge.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 28.
By Bjorn Fehrm
June 27, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We do a Corner series about the state of developments to improve the emission situation for Air Transport. We try to understand why development has been slow.
We have explored various methods to mitigate global warming throughout the series. Over the last few weeks, we have summarized the practical results we can expect from the different alternatives available to reduce global warming in air transport. We looked at the following:
- Alternative, lower-emission propulsion technologies.
- The industry’s typical improvement in fuel consumption over time.
- The improvements that SAF can offer by 2050.
- The different Emission Trading Schemes (ETS) that exist globally.
- And finally, what warming contrail reductions can achieve.
We have summarized what the first four actions can achieve by 2050 and presented the results in a table, Figure 1. Now we add what global warming contrail avoidance can do.
Figure 1. The effects of Actions 1 to 4 on CO2 and NOx counted as CO2e emissions by 2050. Source: Leeham Co.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 27.
By Bjorn Fehrm
June 20, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We do a Corner series about the state of developments to improve the emission situation for Air Transport. We try to understand why development has been slow.
We have examined different ways to lower global warming over the course of the series. Over the last weeks, we have summarized what practical results we can expect from the different alternatives we have to reduce global warming from Air Transport. We looked at the following:
- Alternative, lower-emission propulsion technologies.
- The industry’s typical improvement in fuel consumption over time.
- The improvements that SAF can offer by 2050.
- The different Emission Trading Schemes (ETS) that exist globally.
- Finally, what warming contrail reductions can achieve.
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 26.
By Bjorn Fehrm
June 13, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We do a Corner series about the state of developments to improve the emission situation for Air Transport. We try to understand why development has been slow.
We have examined different ways to lower global warming over the course of the series. Over the last weeks, we have summarized what practical results we can expect from the different alternatives we have to reduce global warming from Air Transport. We looked at the following alternatives:
Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 25.
By Bjorn Fehrm
June 6, 2025, ©. Leeham News: We do a Corner series about the state of developments to improve the emission situation for Air Transport. We try to understand why development has been slow.
We examined alternative, lower-emission propulsion technologies four weeks ago and compared them the following week to the industry’s typical improvement in fuel consumption over time. Then, we examined the improvements that SAF can offer by 2050. Last week, we complemented the picture with the different Emission Trading Schemes (ETS) that exist globally.
Now, we discuss what warming contrail avoidance could achieve in reducing global warming.
Figure 1. A summary of the CO2 and non-CO2 Effective Radiative Forcing (ERF = warming effect) contributions from Air Transport. Source: The report “The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000-2018” by Lee et al. (2021)