Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- Teamsters, Boeing have a new contract April 29, 2025
- Boeing wants to remarket China’s airplanes. It’s costly and time consuming. April 28, 2025
- Bjorn’s Corner: Air Transport’s route to 2050. Part 19. April 25, 2025
- How good is the C929? Part 2. April 24, 2025
- Boeing First Quarter Results Update: China is 10% of the backlog, with 500 in “Unidentified” April 24, 2025
NBA Single or Dual Aisle Airline preferences
Subscription Required
By Vincent Valery
Introduction
Credit: Leeham News
May 10, 2021, © Leeham News: Boeing has been studying the launch of a clean-sheet design aircraft for at least a decade. Studies included a single-aisle design but favored a twin-aisle concept before the 737 MAX launch in 2011. As time went on, the twin-aisle concept morphed into a focus on 767-sized dual-aisle with the New Midmarket Airplane (NMA).
The combination of the 737 MAX crisis, Calhoun’s arrival as CEO, and the COVID-19 pandemic led Boeing to shelve plans to launch the NMA in early 2020. However, the American OEM hasn’t stood idle despite sizable layoffs and R&D budget cuts.
LNA reported Boeing’s renewed focus on dual-aisle design and production systems and studied the tradeoffs between a single- and dual-aisle. The NMA has morphed into the concept of a New Boeing Airplane (NBA).
A critical mass of airlines needs to be willing and able to buy a new aircraft to justify a launch. Most observers agree that Boeing needs to launch a new plane to address the weakening market share in the large single-aisle market. However, there isn’t a consensus whether a single- or dual-aisle is the way to go.
LNA analyses in this article the design preferences of the airlines that could be interested in the NBA.
Summary
- Dual-aisle preferences;
- Different opinions about the required range;
- Low-cost carrier preferences;
- Lessor preferences.
China’s air travel “recovery:” volume improving, but revenue still elusive
Subscription Required
By Judson Rollins
Introduction
May 6, 2021, © Leeham News: In a media briefing this week, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) showed a deep contrast between the airline landscapes in the US and China versus the rest of the world.
The two countries together delivered 55% of the world’s domestic passenger traffic in March, with Chinese domestic capacity approaching 100% of pre-pandemic levels. China’s three largest carriers – Air China, China Eastern Airlines, and China Southern Airlines – are matching their US peers by deploying A350s and 787s on domestic routes, as most international routes to/from China remain closed.
However, first-quarter data continued to paint an ugly picture as unit revenue, or revenue per available seat-kilometer (RASK), was down at every publicly-traded carrier. Some of this was due to reduced load factors in January and February, but a key driver is the ongoing sale of “all you can fly” passes on most Chinese airlines.
Summary
- Domestic load factors have picked up, but international traffic near non-existent.
- First quarter financial reports show unit revenue fell below even last year’s abysmal levels.
- “Airpass” promotions continue, but it’s unclear how long they will go on.
- Fleet utilization during COVID: widebodies down but not out.
Uneven financial challenges among OEMs
Subscription Required
By Vincent Valery
Introduction
May 3, 2021, © Leeham News: The three largest commercial aircraft OEMs and their largest suppliers continue to report impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic in their 2020 financial results.
The pandemic and its impact on airlines’ bottom line is rippling through Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, and their suppliers.
LNA collected financial information on the big three aircraft manufacturers and seven major commercial aircraft suppliers. The impact on each company varied significantly on their earnings, cashflows, and balance sheet.
Summary
- Cashflow and charge challenges at aircraft OEMs;
- Engine OEMs feeling the pressure;
- A more benign picture for other large suppliers;
- Goodwill monitoring.
Why the MAX isn’t back – yet
Subscription Required
By Judson Rollins
Introduction
April 29, 2021, © Leeham News: Much virtual ink has been spilled in recent weeks over an apparent surge in demand for Boeing’s 737 MAX, as a slow drip-drip-drip of cancellations finally reversed into net new orders.
The Boeing team must be grateful to see a shift toward positive headlines for its single-aisle family. Longtime 737 customers provided badly needed votes of confidence with top-ups to their previous orders.
However, such momentum has been slowed by a continuing wave of cancellations. Boeing logged just 12 net orders in February and 40 in March. More cancellations are due to be announced; Turkish Airlines recently said it would cancel or convert to options 50 of its previous MAX orders, and ch-aviation says a single unidentified customer cancelled another 45 in March. Aeromexico swapped MAX orders for other MAX orders, saving $2bn in the process – a revenue hit for Boeing down the line.
The total backlog, net of orders in doubt under ASC 606, is down from a high of 4,708 to just 3,240 as of this week. This is enough to support average production of just 30 airplanes per month through 2029. Boeing CEO David Calhoun said on yesterday’s earnings call that he remains confident the MAX demand will recover from this point forward.
Summary
- New orders are mostly from large existing MAX customers, and likely include mitigation discounts for delivery delays.
- Boeing has 400 undelivered aircraft in storage, some of which were due for delivery to now-defunct airlines.
- Pricing trends are quite negative, depriving Boeing of badly-needed free cash flow.
“There’s light at the end of the tunnel, but the journey is just beginning.”
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Introduction
April 26, 2021, © Leeham News: Aerospace suppliers generally had worse delivery and quality control performance in 2020 than in 2019. By next year, executives think timeliness and quality will return to 95% of pre-pandemic levels.
Eighty-three percent of executives surveyed see delivery rates for narrowbody aircraft improving this year and next.
Forty-nine percent of executives surveyed see airline industry revenues returning to 2019 levels in 24-36 months.
And eco-aviation and sustainability drives will be an increasingly important topic over the next three years.
These are just some of the findings in the annual survey of aerospace and airline executives conducted by the international consulting firm Accenture.
Summary
- “There’s light at the end of the tunnel, but the journey is just beginning.”
- 6-18 month outlook. 2019 survey skipped as the pandemic spread.
- The shift in sustainability-driven is by today’s younger generation.
Unsustainable – and growing – airline debt load weighs on OEMs, suppliers
Subscription Required
By Judson Rollins
Introduction
April 22, 2021, © Leeham News: COVID-19 has forced every layer of the commercial aviation supply chain, apart from cargo airlines, to streamline their businesses and raise cash to survive. Nowhere has this been more true than for passenger airlines, the end-customers for most aviation products.
Before the pandemic, passenger carriers were taking advantage of cheap capital to invest in both new and used aircraft. However, most have stretched their balance sheets beyond imagination by pledging every unencumbered asset – even frequent flyer programs – to raise additional debt.
International Air Transport Association (IATA) economist Brian Pearce said in a February webinar that governments provided $101bn of repayable loans and tax deferrals in 2020 alone. Another $125bn was raised from banks, capital markets, and lessors. More will be required this year.
Governments and markets backstopping the world’s airlines, aided by central bank money printing, are why fewer than 50 have ceased operations since the start of the pandemic. This is not materially worse than a typical year, but it doesn’t begin to reflect the scale of the ongoing financial shock to airlines.
Summary
- Airline demand recovery is prolonged in most regions; new tax and cost pressures loom.
- Debt loads will continue to grow this year; interest expense is mounting.
- High leverage may depress airline capital expenditures through 2030.
- Governments may finally ground loss-making state carriers, adding to used aircraft inventory.
- Aircraft production cuts are already impacting the supply chain.
The conundrum of a new airplane design vs a derivative
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Introduction
April 19, 2020, © Leeham News: When it comes to a decision by an aircraft manufacturer whether to develop an entirely new airplane or a derivative, these multi-billion dollar decisions involve hundreds of thousands of considerations.
Airbus missed with its first A350 design, but has a winner with the A350 XWB. Source: Airbus.
Sometimes derivatives will do the job. Sometimes a new airplane is the better choice.
Given that Boeing faces a decision whether to launch the Next Boeing Airplane (NBA) and Airbus must decide how to respond, all within the next few years, looking at the considerations and some history is timely.
Today’s examination is going to focus at the 40,000 ft level. We’re not going to delve down into the decisions over suppliers or the minutiae into production. Rather, we’re going to look at general strategy.
Summary
- Airbus wins big gamble with A320neo decision.
- Boeing was victor with 787, while Airbus missed with first A350 design.
- Boeing missed with 747-8I and, it appears so far, with 777X.
- Next airplane decision by Boeing will drive Airbus response. Read more
Investors’ bull case on aircraft OEMs has gaps
Subscription Required
By Judson Rollins
Introduction
April 15, 2021, © Leeham News: Late last month, the aerospace and defense analysis team at Credit Suisse (CS) published its view on the future of the Airbus-Boeing duopoly, as well as an introduction to COMAC’s market position and future.
CS’s main thesis struck a decidedly upbeat note: “As a result of excess retirements due to [COVID-19], significant [sustainability investor] pressure on decarbonization, and the appeal of new warrantied aircraft, we might actually expect a period of solid new aircraft demand in a year or two.”
In terms of specific manufacturers, the team was unsurprisingly more bullish on Airbus than Boeing. They cited Airbus’s “strong market positions in narrowbodies” and their expectation that Boeing’s “recovery will be encumbered by the realities of its product portfolio.” CS did see room for longer-term optimism on Boeing, arguing that while spend on new product development “would pressure numbers this decade, it could also shift the competitive pendulum back … helping anchor a higher terminal [share] value.”
However, CS’s view seems to be more optimistic than that reflected in the two manufacturers’ equity prices. Airbus and Boeing shares are down 23% and 26% from their respective early-2020 highs.
A deeper look into their analysis raises several questions about the future trajectory for commercial aircraft sales.
Summary
- Aircraft retirements aren’t the overreaction they appear to be.
- Sustainability is already a priority for airlines and manufacturers; new regulations will only dampen commercial aircraft demand.
- The appeal of new aircraft, while boosted by low interest rates, must be balanced against the wide availability of used ones.
- A slow recovery in business travel will dampen yields, crimping investment in new aircraft.
Today’s 737 MAX, A320neo values vs 2019
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Introduction
April 12, 2021, © Leeham News: The Boeing 737 MAX reentered service in December after a 20 month grounding.
Determining values post-grounding and during the COVID-19 pandemic was complicated. The question over values is further confused by steep discounts given by Boeing as part of its need to compensate customers for the grounding.
There have been few “free market” MAX transactions to establish a solid current market value (CMV). The appraisal firm Aviation Specialists Group (ASG) last week issued its April Guide, listing values of virtually every jet airplane in service—and some that aren’t, yet. (ASG lists the Boeing 737-10 MAX, which is not even in flight testing, but not the 737-7 MAX, which was the lead test airplane for recertification.)
Summary
- MAX values this month compared with April 2019 are double-digit lower on a percentage basis, except for the MAX 10.
- A320neo values softened in the pandemic environment, but are better than the MAX.
- A321neo values went up slightly last month compared with 2019.
Diverging financial fortunes for Airlines and Lessors
Subscription Required
By Vincent Valery
Introduction
Air Lease Corporation A321 XLR Rendering Credit: Airbus
April 5, 2021, © Leeham News: Most airlines and lessors that publish their financial results publicly have done so for 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic harmed all stakeholders’ financials in the commercial aviation industry. However, the impact varies significantly from one group to another. There are also significant differences between companies within a group.
LNA collected financial information on airlines and lessors to assess the pandemic’s economic damage. The differences in financial impact have altered the balance of power within the commercial aviation ecosystem. The varying fortunes will impact each stakeholder’s say in current and future aircraft programs.
Summary
- A financial bloodbath for airlines;
- Financial outliers;
- Lessors mostly ok for now;
- Impact on future OEM programs.